Reply With Quote
doesn't matter, you guys go against Heat you will get your pushed in worse than 2012.
We're a bad matchup for yall. I'm starting to think if there was to be a WCF matchup between us the outcome wouldn't be as easy to predict as I once thought. Our defense is quick enough to stifle the Spurs ball-movement to the point where they turn the Spurs perimeter players to one-on-one players. We'll see the next time we meet up again but if we bother the Spurs ball-movement, we give ourselves a chance throughout the course of a game.
doesn't matter, you guys go against Heat you will get your pushed in worse than 2012.
Calling a finals trip already. Same ol' thunderup, NEXT!
making conclusions after one game..
What a dumbass..
It matters when we beat yall.
its the meth lmao
Where did I call a finals trip?
ol' sport always does this. now that Colts are sucking ass I expect him to switch to a new team pretty soon.
lol alcoholic enemas
Its called an observation.
Nah, Colts fan 4 lyfe partner.ol' sport always does this. now that Colts are sucking ass I expect him to switch to a new team pretty soon.
We're playing down to our compe ion and coasting since we don't have to sweat in our division which includes the H
"Real talk, We're a bad match-up for yall"Its called an observation.
You're a ing re tbh.
thunderup is drunk with meth after the victory
liking a team because of Manning and then ting on him is bandwagon imo. least you're consistent about only appearing when your team wins though.Nah, Colts fan 4 lyfe partner.
We're playing down to our compe ion and coasting since we don't have to sweat in our division which includes the H
See 2012 WCF where we started defending differently on the motion sets the Spurs typically run on the perimeter. Our defensive activity and versatility is one of the few in the league that can disrupt the Spurs' beautiful offense.
Apparently the one that's drunk is you.thunderup is drunk with meth after the victory
Durant+Westbrick= 12/39 and u guys are a bad matchup for us?
Thunderup is a borderline got but think about what you just said. 12/39 and the Thunder still won by a comfy margin.Durant+Westbrick= 12/39 and u guys are a bad matchup for us?
Honestly I'm more worried about the Blazers.
Now there is a nightmare of a matchup.
Well of course I was a fan of his when we drafted him. I was a fan of the colts before we drafted Manning btw, something I've mentioned before.
I've actually posted sporadically this season. I'm a pretty big deal IRL so as you can imagine, I'm quite the busy man.
I've seen about 12-13 teams that defend the spurs the same way..You're a ing dumbass..Your team is a tier weaker than OKC 2012, and the spurs missed about 10 chippies in the second half with leonard missing about 7. It was a bad game overall with Leonard and Parker trying to go hero ball..The team lacked intensity. It's no longer a bad matchup without a legit third guy...See 2012 WCF where we started defending differently on the motion sets the Spurs typically run on the perimeter. Our defensive activity and versatility is one of the few in the league that can disrupt the Spurs' beautiful offense.
It's one ing game..
again, you're just a ing re .
What lost us the game was the Ayers/Diaw/Mills lineup, what we can take out from this is that Kawhi forced countless airballs from Durant and Westbrick couldn't score in the paint.
We don't know if Pop will play the same lineups when the playoffs starts...
Hey partner. Haven't seen you in awhile. Welcome back.
I've seen about 12-13 teams that defend the sp
It's one fu
again, you're just a fu
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
