Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    24,488
    What scenario should happen for the NBA to consider reducing the amount of games? 82 is way too long.

    - Back to Back should be eliminated

    - 4 games in 5..

    Honestly, 82 games just reduces the overall compe ive level in the Regular season...

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    43,448
    Umm no.

    82 games is nothing to these guys. Or at least it shouldn't be.

    There will be grind out games but that's the way it should be. This is a young's men game so scaling the schedule back because its too grueling would be a pussified move and would take some of its credibility in my opinion.

  3. #3
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    15,577
    Greedy owners and really almost as greedy players will not give up the bucks.

    Should be a 50 game season. Smaller number of teams also.

    What could happen now is coaches could use their benches more liberally. But that's not gonna happen either.
    SternPuppet fining the Popoviches for using subs.

  4. #4
    Banned
    My Team
    Seattle Supersonics
    Post Count
    7,072
    66 games, imo.

  5. #5
    Veteran Arcadian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    9,423
    Definitely should, probably won't

  6. #6
    Believe. elmanutres's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    2,983
    nba wouldn't risk losing the extra bucks of 82 games. They care more about money than their players

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •