Reply With Quote
If that sexual hadn't given him his 2nd you'd have your 5th instead of 6.
ha, ha.
I know I would... who's a better heir to timmy's throne than the king himself
If that sexual hadn't given him his 2nd you'd have your 5th instead of 6.
ha, ha.
timmy's not gay.
It's amazing how underpaid NBA Superstars are. It's a horrible system no doubt.
Poor Lebron. Some guys really have it rough.
sign Lebeta for about 2 million a year, mostly so you could sign people who are actually good at the game so he could ride their coattails.
No
But a lot of teams would if the option was available.
No professional athlete actually deserves the ridiculous contracts they get.
no. The dude would be like 40 something making 30 mill. That's like... Kobe Bryant contract bad.
That's stupid, I'd rather use that money to lock up Leonard, Green, and Diaw. It takes chemistry and a team, not a superstar.
What do they deserve?
& I'm not 3 score +.
You've nary loom, your Kobe Blyant is a sexual too.
Maybe if he were 20-22. It's unproductive to give athletes long contracts, what if they get bored halfway through?
If teams didn't have a cap, NY & LA (and maybe Chicago) would be the only two ball clubs who would offer a 10 year contract to Lebron tbh.
Cleveland as well, they'd divert every penny towards Lebron and let him spit in their mouth.
This is the same idiot that tried to call Venti a terrible poster in the other thread. Now he brings this?
GNSFs smh...tbh
^ Why didn't you just start a thread en led: "Who Here Will Help Me Deep Throat Lebron's and Out His ".... just saying
$30M is fine. But I would do 5 years, tops.
Certainly not $300 million over 10 years. A lot can happen in 10 years. Sure give your franchise player 4-5 years of max money, but 10 years is too much. Can always re-up for another 5 if he lives up to his contract.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
