There were only 31 seconds left. Pop was going for the 2-for-1. It was the right strategy, imo. But Parker should've just shot it instead of dumping it down to Duncan.
Am I the only one that absolutely hates that strategy? I rather take one 3pt shot with a 30%+ chance of going in than going for two. Going for two is only good when it's a wide open layup and that's rarely happens. In this case we got a turnover but in many cases the two point attempt is 50-60% chance shot at best.
There were only 31 seconds left. Pop was going for the 2-for-1. It was the right strategy, imo. But Parker should've just shot it instead of dumping it down to Duncan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)