Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    Suck One Pop poop's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,157
    That would have sent it into overtime? Fisher jumped directly into barry, full body contact, barry goes down...the refs swallow the whistle...Lakers win, going up 3-1 instead of the spurs being able to tie series 2-2.

    It was as clear cut of a foul as you can get. The refs did nothing. The whole arguement from everyone was 'well they let them play' ' they didnt bail them(the spurs) out, that would have been lame to decide the game at the foul line'..the whole arguement was that the refs usually dont call fouls at the end of a close game unless it was a pretty hard foul.
    Decent reasoning here, let the players decide the game.

    Now someone explain to me just WTF happened on that ridiculous foul call last nite...westbrick goes for a hero 3 pointer, paul goes straight up with a textbook contest, virtually no discernable contact at all. Whistle blows, Okc gets to decide the game with freethrows.
    What a complete joke

  2. #2
    The Wemby Assembly z0sa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    15,772
    The NBA apologized but in reality Brent barry should have flopped his ass off or at least threw up a shot. He got caught in no mans land gambling on a 50/50 call (considering opponent and time remaining) and the Spurs paid the price.

    as for the clippers... you just cant let that happen. the foul for a second... What was that abortion of a play as time expired? CP3 driving to within a few feet of the rim with milliseconds remaining, only needing a 2 - optimal situation one would think. Just look at Game 2 vs Grizz last season. I expected a shot attempt at any rate. What transpired instead, especially the ball bouncing nonchalantly off legs then slowly rolling along the floor, invoked only pity. Full re is never pretty.

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    Classy Brent Barry didn't complain about a foul. He didn't even acknowledge that he was fouled. That said, different refs and different games that are years apart. I get the inconsistency, but I don't think it is part of a bigger league conspiracy. In fact, I see the NBA more interested in the Clippers (with bankable stars like Paul and Griffin) making it to the finals (getting a big, big market involved) over OKC.

  4. #4
    Veteran dunkman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    3,408
    Its the Lakers, tbh . . . they got away with anything during the Stern era. His "ideal finals" were "Lakers vs. Lakers". Now, for some reason OKC gets a preferential treatment too. The NBA thinks Westbrook and Durant are very marketable.

  5. #5
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    It's entertainment.

  6. #6
    Veteran superbigtime's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    3,225
    Unbiased refereeing seems to be a dream for basketball fans. Crooked .

  7. #7
    Wanted: Dead or Alive Cowboys_Wear_Spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    2,952
    NBA apologizes and said it was a foul after the fact. Made me feel SOOOOO much better.

    Game should have gone into OT (assuming Barry hit both FTs). But Barry should have just jumped straight up and shot the ball. Fisher would not have been able to stop himself from jumping into the Barry. Barry just gaffed on the play.

    But the milk has already dried up for me on this one.

  8. #8
    Believe. StoneBuddha's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    347
    Wasn't Barry (who was hot at the end of the game) shooting a 3-ptr? They call that foul and Spurs are 2-2 going back to LA.

  9. #9
    2 Doors Down BillMc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    20,599
    That would have sent it into overtime? Fisher jumped directly into barry, full body contact, barry goes down...the refs swallow the whistle...Lakers win, going up 3-1 instead of the spurs being able to tie series 2-2.

    It was as clear cut of a foul as you can get. The refs did nothing. The whole arguement from everyone was 'well they let them play' ' they didnt bail them(the spurs) out, that would have been lame to decide the game at the foul line'..the whole arguement was that the refs usually dont call fouls at the end of a close game unless it was a pretty hard foul.
    Decent reasoning here, let the players decide the game.

    Now someone explain to me just WTF happened on that ridiculous foul call last nite...westbrick goes for a hero 3 pointer, paul goes straight up with a textbook contest, virtually no discernable contact at all. Whistle blows, Okc gets to decide the game with freethrows.
    What a complete joke
    Not to mention in Game 6 of the finals, Bosh body-slammed Green on that last shot of overtime. But because it was a body blow and not on the wrist, it wasn't called. But if you breathe on Westbrook or Durant, they call the foul. Heck, it was that way for their ex-teammate Harden, though he didn't get the calls in the last game of the Thunder series.

  10. #10
    Wanted: Dead or Alive Cowboys_Wear_Spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    2,952
    Wasn't Barry (who was hot at the end of the game) shooting a 3-ptr? They call that foul and Spurs are 2-2 going back to LA.
    No. Barry pumped faked, got fisher in the air, try to go around Fisher, but couldn't b/c Fisher jumped into him (OBVIOUS FOUL), then shot 3 after the contact. Even if the foul was called, it would have been on the floor (not on the shot) and the Lakers were over the limit at that point.

  11. #11
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    No. Barry pumped faked, got fisher in the air, try to go around b/c Fisher, but couldn't b/c Fisher jumped into him (OBVIOUS FOUL), then shot 3 after the contact. Even if the foul was called, it would have been on the floor (not on the shot) and the Lakers were over the limit at that point.
    Right. I think even when the league issued the statement, they said it should have been a two-shot foul.

  12. #12
    Believe. k_nguyen93's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Post Count
    403
    We missed out on a Duncan Garnett final that year. I'm sure league was happy with a Celtics Lakers finals though.

  13. #13
    Suck One Pop poop's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,157
    It is just hilarious when you compare the two, and see which one was called and which one wasnt

  14. #14
    Nostradamas Jr.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Post Count
    33,691
    Remember Fisher's shot with 0.4 secs?

    10 years ago yesterday.



  15. #15
    Veteran davidbowie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,697
    haha i havent thought about that in so long

    i was so pissed at brent for not flopping up some bs shot

    sigh

  16. #16
    Veteran davidbowie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,697
    Remember Fisher's shot with 0.4 secs?

    10 years ago yesterday.


    remember tim's miraculous game winner right before that? yeah me neither lol

  17. #17
    Veteran in2deep's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,104
    It's entertainment.

  18. #18
    Nostradamas Jr.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Post Count
    33,691
    remember tim's miraculous game winner right before that? yeah me neither lol
    Tim also had a great game winner nulified right before Manu's bonehead foul on Dirk and his driving layup which gave Dallas the tieing point to send game into OT, whereupon Spurs lost. Tim has had two great moments stolen from him.

  19. #19
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    4,829
    Unbiased refereeing seems to be a dream for basketball fans. Crooked .


    Also so it is a "non-contact sport". Yeah right.

  20. #20
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Tim also had a great game winner nulified right before Manu's bonehead foul on Dirk and his driving layup which gave Dallas the tieing point to send game into OT, whereupon Spurs lost. Tim has had two great moments stolen from him.
    LOL, what? Manu was the one who put the Spurs ahead with that three.

  21. #21
    Burn The Thread. Horry Hipcheck's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    3,584
    Tim also had a great game winner nulified right before Manu's bonehead foul on Dirk and his driving layup which gave Dallas the tieing point to send game into OT, whereupon Spurs lost. Tim has had two great moments stolen from him.
    Duncan was on the far elbow with his back to the basket and when Dallas committed the double team, he hit Manu for basically a wide open 3 to give the Spurs their first lead with 32 seconds left. Manu nullified his own heroic shot with that foul, not TD's.

  22. #22
    Nostradamas Jr.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Post Count
    33,691
    Duncan was on the far elbow with his back to the basket and when Dallas committed the double team, he hit Manu for basically a wide open 3 to give the Spurs their first lead with 32 seconds left. Manu nullified his own heroic shot with that foul, not TD's.
    You're right. The shot where TD hit the shot and slid backwards on his ass after the shot was against LA, not Dallas.

    Take away those two plays, of Fish and Manu's dumb play and Spurs would prob have 5-6 rings.

  23. #23
    Nostradamas Jr.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Post Count
    33,691
    You're right. The shot where TD hit the shot and slid backwards on his ass after the shot was against LA, not Dallas.

    Take away those two plays, of Fish and Manu's dumb play and Spurs would prob have 5-6 rings.
    Also if not for TD's torn miniscus in 2000 against the Kings, when SA had best record, and if last year's melt down did not occur, they could have had two more rings. Those 4 incidences cost them from beating out Chicago for the best dynasty since the 60's Celtics

  24. #24
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Steve Javie says that refs consider the implications of the call and will lean more toward rewarding the team with the momentum. If a team is on a tear, they will get the call, if the team is making a comeback, they'll get the call. It makes the game seem more fluid and doesn't disrupt momentum.

    Imagine a chess game like that where the rules change based on the last move or who you're playing and where.

  25. #25
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    What about the years that the Spurs got embarrassed by teams in the playoffs? If that didn't happen, the Spurs could have 30 or so rings.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •