Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,096
    I think they were. Name a team that you could argue on a nightly basis that their backup played better. Splitter or Diaw, Mills, Ginobili (though reallly a starter), and Belinelli.

  2. #2
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Post Count
    2,152
    I think if you went solely based on PER they're statistically the deepest team or at least they're up there. There are probably better stats to use though.

  3. #3
    Believe. keepinitwill's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    70
    They definitely have to be up there. The "Bad Boy" Pistons come to mind as a deep team. Nobody averged 20 ppg like our Spurs.

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/DET/1990.html

  4. #4
    Veteran Danny.Zhu's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    2,122
    If it was a 6-quarter game, I think we may take down that Jordan/Bull team...

  5. #5
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    yes

  6. #6
    R.C. Deez Nuts. Mugen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    23,765
    Easily. The Spurs closed the last three playoff series with their only "All Star" being MIA for most of those games.

  7. #7
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    They definitely have to be up there. The "Bad Boy" Pistons come to mind as a deep team. Nobody averged 20 ppg like our Spurs.

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/DET/1990.html
    They were deeper in 89 before they lost Mahorn to the expansion draft.

  8. #8
    Suck One Pop poop's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,157
    Maybe, 2003 was ridiculous too

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •