Reply With Quote
Because you like making up stupid generalities that are based on nothing.
Africa is for africans, Asia is for asians, but white countries are for EVERYBODY!
Because you like making up stupid generalities that are based on nothing.
Africa is for Africans
America is for Americans so why do they have to invade Iraq, Afghanistan, Grenada, Panama, and generally around in and mess up other countries?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 07-14-2014 at 07:50 AM.
Why, just to piss you off, deux.
What's the matter, XZ, can't defend America ing up the planet and losing wars?
Boutons, I don't have to defend my country for any actions they have taken. The stupid people like you who have caused most of the problems. If most of you had a brain you would take it out and play with it. lllllooooooo Obama, Reid, Kennedy, Pelosi, and half the Dimm-o-crap party.
to destabilize their governments and take advantage of their resources.
A side effect of doing this is creating lots and lots of refugees.
If that is the case, America is for the Native Americans. Enjoy your return trip to whatever country your ancestors hailed from.
Typical bull boomer refusing to accept responsibility for the world they have left for the rest of us.
The main issue of this century that is largely ignored is the amazing demographic changes that are coming. If you have the time read the UN's report to the year 2300.
http://www.un.org/esa/population/pub...p2300final.pdf
A shorter story:
https://www.un.org/en/development/de...n-by-2050.html
More people in Nigeria alone than the entire US by 2050. Think about that; Nigeria's not that big. Somebody forgot to tell the Africans that when your death rates drop your birth rates are supposed to drop at the same rate. Of course, millions of those Nigerians won't be staying in Nigeria. Where will they go? Asians don't have white guilt. They'll be fleeing to white countries to be oppressed by the white man. If you think there's an invasion of the US and Europe by the 3rd world today... you ain't seen nothing yet.World population projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050
13 June 2013, New York
The world’s population grew to seven billion in 2011. UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe
The current world population of 7.2 billion is projected to increase by 1 billion over the next 12 years and reach 9.6 billion by 2050, according to a United Nations report launched today, which points out that growth will be mainly in developing countries, with more than half in Africa.
“Although population growth has slowed for the world as a whole, this report reminds us that some developing countries, especially in Africa, are still growing rapidly,” said the Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, Wu Hongbo in a press release on the report.
The report, World Population Prospects: the 2012 Revision, notes that the population of developed regions will remain largely unchanged at around 1.3 billion from now until 2050. In contrast, the 49 least developed countries are projected to double in size from around 900 million people in 2013 to 1.8 billion in 2050.
Compared to previous assessments of world population trends, the new projected total population is higher, mainly due to new information obtained on fertility levels of certain countries. For example, in 15 high-fertility countries of sub-Saharan Africa, the estimated average number of children per woman has been adjusted upwards by more than 5 per cent.
“In some cases, the actual level of fertility appears to have risen in recent years; in other cases, the previous estimate was too low,” said the Director of the Population Division in the UN’s Department of Economic and Social Affairs, John Wilmoth, during a press conference in New York.
“While there has been a rapid fall in the average number of children per woman in large developing countries such as China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Brazil and South Africa […] rapid growth is expected to continue over the next few decades in countries with high levels of fertility such as Nigeria, Niger, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia and Uganda but also Afghanistan and Timor-Leste, where there are more than five children per woman.”
Mr. Wilmoth added that changes in fertility rates over the next few decades could have major consequence for population size, structure and distribution in the long run.
The report notes that India is expected to become the world’s largest country, passing China around 2028, when both countries will have populations of 1.45 billion. After that, India’s population will continue to grow and China’s is expected to start decreasing. Meanwhile, Nigeria’s population is expected to surpass that of the United States before 2050.
Europe’s population is projected to decline by 14 per cent, the report states, and Mr. Wilmoth warned that the continent is already facing challenges in providing care and support for a rapidly aging population.
Overall, life expectancy is projected to increase in developed and developing countries in future years. At the global level, it is projected to reach 76 years in the period 2045-2050 and 82 years in 2095-2100. By the end of the century, people in developed countries could live on average around 89 years, compared to about 81 years in developing regions.
The report’s figures are based on a comprehensive review of available demographic data from 233 countries and areas around the world, including the 2010 round of population censuses.
Source: UN News
For more information: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm
The politically incorrect thing to notice today is that we are living in the 3rd attempted Islamic takeover of Europe, after the north African Arabs in Spain and France in the 700s and the Ottoman Turks that were stopped in Austria in the 1600s. This will end in blood as always. Thank your local Marxists and their death cult of cultural equality.
You don't think "the man" has already worked through this and has a solution in place?
"The man" is complicit
then I'm not going to worry about this right now
Well said
USA doesn't. They will simply spin it to the cheeseburger eating NFL watching masses as superior sports, music & fashion.
Europe has already halted their Non-European immigration. But as Bill_Brasky mentioned, the USA goes around the Globe de-stabilizing nations and then refugees (like currently Syrians) show up on European coasts in banana boats.
1st Step: Stop supplying other regions with food & resources. If they can't sustain themselves then they must adapt on their own.
...And on our southern borders.....Europe has already halted their Non-European immigration. But as Bill_Brasky mentioned, the USA goes around the Globe de-stabilizing nations and then refugees (like currently Syrians) show up on European coasts in banana boats.
What if the Native Americans had taken this philosophy...Stop supplying other regions with food & resources. If they can't sustain themselves then they must adapt on their own.
Damn Brad...you sound like Hagee....The politically incorrect thing to notice today is that we are living in the 3rd attempted Islamic takeover of Europe, after the north African Arabs in Spain and France in the 700s and the Ottoman Turks that were stopped in Austria in the 1600s. This will end in blood as always. Thank your local Marxists and their death cult of cultural equality.
They'd be better off today
No doubt...
because colonizers exploited third world countries and taught them english, french, etc. now you have refugees and educated individuals retracing their steps back to the colonizers. imo, it actually works more for the benefit of the US because we attract so many hardworking, english speaking specialists from those nations. not only do we exploit third world countries for resources, we do it for labor as well. ask germany about turkey.
world population is going to continue to decline as households become less nuclear and you have both men and women fighting over the same jobs. it's really not anything to worry about unless you're concerned about ethnic mixing, but it's completely natural to look for someone with a diverse gene pool that way your kids aren't susceptible to diseases. and the only reason if ethnic mixing bothers you is if you're not getting laid enough yourself.
^a ing cultural marxist? from texas? i spit on you
btw mixed breed children are ok the first generation then after that their genetics go to
US has always prided itself on being a cultural melting pot. it's time to put those words into action imo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
