Leonard has no backup and he needs reps to get better and learn to be the #1/2 option
he's finally acknowledging himself now in a recent interview
http://www.expressnews.com/sports/sp...39be4660723#/0
In the Finals, I'm playing 35 minutes a game, so I'm on the floor more and able to score the ball more and get more rebounds, Leonard said. I'm going to have to get consistent minutes to play at a consistent level like that.
es gonna .
So will this be the year re ed fans stop questioning the best coach in the NBA and franchise history?
And "conclusion jumpers" jump to conclusions, without all the facts.
I see "reporting" of "some" facts, not all, rather than " ing".
Don't you, or is it just plain old " ing" to you, and if so, isn't that a pretty wild judgement call (assumption?) on your part?
^ That is your answer to my question?
Chump Translation: I was talking out my ass.
No Avante Jr., the translation is this:
Your next post will be a shining example.
How do you arrive at that conclusion?
Because es . So it's a fair prediction that es are going to given the chance.
Here's your chance right now.
You may prove me wrong if you don't like a es, .
Who do you claim is " ing", and why do you think what they are reporting is " ing" in reality.
Also, who made you judge and jury that they are " es" in the first place?
Next you will argue that it is "self-evident".
I understand your convoluted logic now.
I don't think its too big of a deal in the reg season. I kind of hate when he tries to manage minutes in the playoffs though. Especially with Kawhi/Green. People have this misconception that Pop has always done this which is simply not true. He used to play Duncan 40+ mpg in his early years iirc.
his first about 5 or 6 years was 40 minutes in the playoffs and reg season basically
and people should just put ChumpdDumper and Tpark on their ignore list and you'll have a better Spurstalk experience
Why would I not be able judge whether people are es in my opinion?
Who would make that rule?
You?
So then, you admit this is just your OPINION and not a statement of fact, which is how you worded it?
Your inference was faulty. Again, i can't understand things for you.
I understand exactly now.
You were talking out your ass, that simple!
I think you illustrated my point perfectly.
Thanks!
Feel free to continue doing so.
I think you illustrated my point perfectly.
Thanks!
Feel free to continue doing so.
No, but you are forgiven your ignorance in the matter.
God wouldn't be so insincere.
I think you illustrated my point perfectly.
Thanks!
Feel free to continue doing so.
I hope you choke. You ruin so many good threads.
Did you consider this one a good thread?
I rather considered it a duplicate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
