I'm not against some type of reform, but the changes that are being advocated are too severe and will likely have some of the repercussions that Presti outlined. A better system would be to not allow teams consecutive years of high picks, so for instance if a team gets the 1st overall pick (or within the top 3) in 2014, then the highest they can get in 2015 is the 6th overall pick. In the case the team got a pick 1-5, all the other teams would just move up a spot. They could even extend it so in the third year the highest pick they can get is the 8th or 10th or something. That would prevent teams from tanking for years on end while still allowing them the opportunity to get some talent if needed.
Personally I have a bigger problem with the Cavs acquiring 3 overall #1 picks and another 2-3 in the top 5 over a 4 year period due to the incompetence of its FO then I have with a team that is perpetual 1st round fodder and decides to blow it up rather than continue to be mediocre and on the bubble year after year.

Reply With Quote
Except you've bragged in the past about the high draft picks that Fredo is supposedly going to get, so on some level, you feel incompetence should be rewarded.
