Reply With Quote
And shout to Mikeanaro for posting the original link.
And shout to Mikeanaro for posting the original link.
Lol gothicevita.com
Just read the article. Very little personal opinion and mostly facts and stats.
I concur, with education and appropriate language we can have stats and facts that show us dude is hurting the team.
At least he is not bisexual like Antonia.
Preaching to the choir. Only gots deny this .
Great read, tbh
Some how it's all supposed to change in the playoffs.
Pop is one unreasonable got.
Why are you posting an article from January. Those stats are stale and reflect mostly his play while overcoming injuries. Where are the stats the last few weeks of the season when the Spurs were on a roll? Let me guess, you don't have any of those stats. Well, without those, then this article is inconclusive and you don't know if the stats mean anything today.
Bahahahahahahahahahahshahaha. He is playing worse now then ever. Geezus you're a ing re .
This guy almost has more excuses than Tony Parker.
so much new information i just got from this january article
Don't be a got. He's played bad all season. And he is playing bad now. The stats are very much relevant.so much new information i just got from this january article
Actually, he has played better than back in January. You are the re as you can't even acknowledge the fact that the article is outdated. I'm not even a Parker fan, but I struggle to accept ignorant commentary and if you were at all honest in your criticism of Parker, you would acknowledge the holes, but you are just a blanket hater, which is a wonder why I have even bothered engaging you. Well, I only did it for today because I was looking for someone to argue with.
Cd98, has managed to come up with multiple excuses for Parkers play. Impressive.
This is your etherer? SMH Barrel lickers.
Aaron McGuire works as a statistician for a moderately large financial services company
No he hasn't you . He's been all season. Post stats or gtfo.
So now stats don't mean anything?
I'll still go for the eye test. I haven't seen a surefire way to remove Parker from heavy minutes against starters and have ball movement. If Bobo didn't fall off a cliff I'd take a flier on point forward. IF Kyle weren't a rookie.....if manu werent getting older......if Mills could actually play PG....if cojo could be consistent.
I'm actually a Pop fan. And because I am a Pop fan, I side with him on idiot takes like Patty Mills or COJO should play 30 minutes a game over Parker. Again, if we had CP3 on our team, yes, I'd want him to play over Parker, but we don't. We have Parker, and he's been good enough to win 4 les with during his career, so he's good enough to start and get us to the promised land. He's not my 6th favorite player on the team, but I'm a Spurs fan, not a player fan, and I prefer we go with the guys that can best win a le. And 30 minutes of Mills or COJO ain't it.
i know he's been bad. what i dont know is why you felt urged to start yet another thread just to reiterate it yet again
Hahahahaha, let's post some Tim Duncan articles from 2010 to prove he's not a good player while we're at it!so much new information i just got from this january article
No, they mean he was struggling back in January. And it's true, he was. But he picked up his play. And one thing you fail to understand is that stats tell you one limited thing and you can only extrapolate so much information from the stats. Which is why smart people like Pop aren't fooled by stats that show guys like Mills and COJO have less turnovers than Parker, because he knows that they don't have the ball like Parker and he knows that he doesn't want them to handle the ball in half court against pressure, that's why he plays them with Manu and has Manu handle. If you were honest in your assessment of the article, you would admit these things, but you're just a blind hater without true logic.So now stats don't mean anything?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
