Again, as I mentioned in another thread (on ELO rating) these type of statistical team rankings don't factor the Popovich dynamic (i.e. he sacrifices wins --> for the greater develomental good of the squad, he doesn't tend to run-up scores in favor of more rest for his starters, and more development for end-of-bench guys, etc... ). In short, many Spurs teams could be ranked higher if not for his approach --> but that doesn't make those teams any less great. For example, the way the Spurs played in the Finals last year was a thing of beauty - basketball perfection; had they sustained that type of play year-round the Spurs would have had over 70 wins with an average margin of victory above 10 ppg. Not only was that type of play unsustainable, but the expectation that it should be sustainable is just not logical - given the make up of the team. Still, that team was GREAT. Statistically the greatest margin of victory on a per game basis on the greatest stage. That's why averaging over the regular season to gauge the strength of the team vs that team is about as subjective as it gets.
Even this year's Spurs spanked that Warriors behind TWICE... in highly convincing fashion.

Reply With Quote
