Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Post Count
    54,257
    "Feels over reals" is now officially codified in law:

    The bill creates a regime under which digital communications causing "serious emotional distress" are subject to an escalating regime that starts as "negotiation, mediation or persuasion" but reaches up to creating the offences of not complying with an order, and "causing harm by posting digital communication."

    The most serious offenders would face two years in jail or a maximum fine of NZ$50,000 (US$33,900).


    After it passed by a 116-to-5 vote in New Zealand's parliament, Gareth Hughes, one of the four Greens MPs to vote against the bill, said it was overly broad and “risks limiting our freedom of expression”.
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07...mer_at_trolls/

  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,867
    overblown. laws against harassment are nothing new.

  3. #3
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,867
    on the phone or on the internet or in person, free speech has never meant freedom to make someone else's life .

  4. #4
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Post Count
    54,257
    "Serious emotional distress" has become more and more subjective in recent years, as have "sexism" and "racism." SJWs will be using this law to get people fined or thrown in jail for disagreeing with them and disrupting their hugbox, don't think they won't.

  5. #5
    Believe. admiralsnackbar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    4,010
    "Serious emotional distress" has become more and more subjective in recent years, as have "sexism" and "racism." SJWs will be using this law to get people fined or thrown in jail for disagreeing with them and disrupting their hugbox, don't think they won't.
    Considering people hurt one another's feelings online every day, it would be unrealistic to think all NZ trolls are on the brink of prosecution (because it would be unfeasible to prosecute). So against your admonitions... I think they won't.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •