Reply With Quote
that may be the nature of coverage
What began as comical is now becoming annoying:
At the Roberts hearings yesterday, CNN cut away from Sen. Mike DeWine (R-OH), cut back -- hurriedly --to catch Dianne Feinstein's (D-CA) full questioning, then cut away (dismissively) from Sen. Sessions (R-AL). This morning they had a bunch of Sen. Leahy (D-VT), then cut away from Sens. Coburn (R-OK) and Brownback (R-KS) and then back to Ted Kennedy (D-MA).
I would be interested to hear if there's an explanation other than the obvious.
that may be the nature of coverage
TRO, your partisanship is showing, too. Why didn't you give les to Senators Feinstein and Kennedy, when you did for all the GOP officials?
But you did give some love to that socialist hack from Vermont. C'mon, man!
I don't know about any of that, but I caught some of the *replay* last night....and whatever political affiliation, Biden is a .
I'm not a news organization.
TRO, your partisanship is showing, too. Why didn't you give les to Senators Feinstein and Kennedy, when you did for all the GOP officials?
But you did give some love to that socialist hack from Vermont. C'mon, man!
TRO, why do you bother watching communnist/socialist/liberal CNN?
They have every right to cover whateve they want, in whatever style/slant they want, just like Fox and MSNBC.
The "story" of these hearings is not CNN or FOX, it's what's going on in the hearing room.
CNN, NYT, WP don't hide or deny the widely known fact that they have liberal/left-of-center orientation.
OTOH, Fox's huge lie is that they are "Fair and Balanced (R)", somehow perfectly objective.
yeah theyre so "fair and balanced". that they have to say it over and over again, so we'll know
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
