I don't know how you justify ranking Yao ahead of Amare when Amare has been better every year so far and had a top-5 MVP candidate season, capped off by 29-11-2 in the playoffs?
What more does Amare need to do in comparison to Yao, who, hasn't cracked 20 points per yet, nor 10 rebounds per or gotten past the first round or won any awards...
It baffles me the way they use his height and potential as reasoning behind such a claim. What? Amare's now hit his ceiling? He's younger and better than Yao and his far more potential, so, how is Yao ever going to be better?
Kahn isn't a bad writer. I like his takes, but Iverson as the best PG and now Yao over Amare? It just doesn't add up.

Reply With Quote
Thats what i'm talking about :P
