Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Fifth Circuit Reverses Criminal Conviction of Citgo in Corpus Christi Pollution Case

    Earlier this month, a federal appeals court dealt Corpus Christi residents a harsh blow, overturning the criminal conviction of Citgo Petroleum Corp. for violations of the Clean Air Act. The ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is the latest in a legal drama that has dragged on for more than a decade.

    The Citgo conviction in 2007 marked the first time a major oil company was found guilty of criminal air pollution by a jury. It was also the first time that victims of air pollution were recognized under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.

    Prosecutors established that two mammoth oil-water separator tanks lacked emission controls and were exposing residents of Hillcrest, a neighborhood adjacent to the Citgo refinery, to dangerous levels of benzene, a known carcinogen.


    Last summer, the federal judge in the case, after seven years of delay, finally reached a sentence, fining the multibillion oil giant a mere $2 million. The judge also denied res ution to the victims, including reimbursements for medicals costs or moving away from the refinery. The decision by the Fifth Circuit panel removes even a symbolic victory.


    “The most disappointing thing is we fought so hard to get the victims victim status, and this just wipes that away,” said Melissa Jarrell, a criminal justice professor at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi. “[The panel decided that] not only are they not victims, but Citgo did not commit a crime and that to me is just impossible given the evidence.”


    The unanimous Fifth Circuit decision turned on a technical point: the definition of oil-water separator tanks. Such tanks must be covered to prevent significant emissions. During Citgo’s trial, the court instructed the jury that any tank used to separate oil and water should be construed as, you got it, an oil-water separator tank. But the Fifth Circuit said that oil-water separator tanks are only those that are used for that purpose and have certain physical components. Those at Citgo lacked the components and therefore were not subject to the pollution controls, the justices found.


    “Whatever technicality they’re claiming doesn’t change the fact that they had benzene in those tanks,” said Daniel Peña, a Hillcrest resident. “Whatever they called the tanks doesn’t matter — the fact is they had benzene there and it was an open container in the neighborhood.”

    But according to the Fifth Circuit, if the tanks weren’t oil-water separators, Citgo didn’t violate the Clean Air Act by keeping them uncovered.

    “That is an extremely contorted analysis of the English language,” said Bill Miller, a former EPA attorney who was on the original prosecution team. In its analysis, he said, the three-judge panel failed to consider the evidence that Citgo removed tens of thousands of gallons of oil from the top of the two tanks each time inspectors came by, passing them off as equalizer tanks.

    http://www.texasobserver.org/fifth-c...ct-conviction/

    aka, Repug pro-BigCorp "jurisprudence"



  2. #2
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    But Hugo Chavez has the right to come give Americans cancer to save a few bucks

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    more VRWC rulings from the VRWC-stuffed garbage 5th circuit

    Federal Appeals Court Upholds Injunction Against Obama's Executive Action On Immigration

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...ushpmg00000003

    appealed to SCOTUS?

  4. #4
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    Well, the 5th circuit court only agreed with Obama himself when he said 22 times (on video) that he didn't have the authority to do what he turned around and did on immigration.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •