Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. 09-15-2005 #1
    2centsworth
    Homer 2centsworth's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    8,677
    Who should I start Bledsoe or Brooks? Have Jack Delohme but he's playing NE and he played like crap last week.

    Please advise
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote 2centsworth is offline
  2. 09-15-2005 #2
    Trainwreck2100
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    40,879
    Who hits more Homeruns??????

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Trainwreck2100 is offline
  3. 09-15-2005 #3
    Horry For 3!
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    Post Count
    18,446
    Quote Originally Posted by 2centsworth
    Who should I start Bledsoe or Brooks? Have Jack Delohme but he's playing NE and he played like crap last week.

    Please advise
    Wrong place suppose to be in NFL forum but...

    I'll probably go with Bledsoe. Cowboys are playing the Redskins def that is alright but sucks against the pass. Brooks has to play against the Giants def that is alright as well but Deuce is suppose to get a lot of carries. As Parcells he is going to limit Julius' carries so that means more passing for Bledsoe. Bledsoe to Johnson = TD
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Horry For 3! is offline
  4. 09-16-2005 #4
    IceColdBrewski
    Pass The Brew IceColdBrewski's Avatar
    Post Count
    3,890
    Brooks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote IceColdBrewski is offline
  5. 09-16-2005 #5
    coz
    Rebel With A Coz
    Post Count
    812
    brooks, no way you start bledsoe vs washington
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote coz is offline
  6. 09-16-2005 #6
    coz
    Rebel With A Coz
    Post Count
    812
    in fact, unless it's saints v baltimore, i start brroks every week over bledsoe.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote coz is offline
  7. 09-16-2005 #7
    samikeyp
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    I start Brooks...not solely because Bledsoe is playing Washington, but because Brooks is the better choice...he will get you more stats.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote samikeyp is offline
  8. 09-16-2005 #8
    2pac
    Gangsta Photog 2pac's Avatar
    Post Count
    1,461
    Anyone who says Bledsoe is a Cowboys homer. Brooks is a far better choice. Joe Horn, Dante Stallworth, Deuce McAllister all catch ball from him. He can scramble. Saints have a more vertical offense and he doesnt get sacked as much.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote 2pac is offline
  9. 09-16-2005 #9
    batman2883
    I LIKE THEM BOOTY'S batman2883's Avatar
    Post Count
    19,311
    Bledsoe, Bledsoe has a far better receiving crew than Brooks, not to mention Jason Whitten as a tight end come on now.....Brooks just has Joe Horn nothing more nothing less...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote batman2883 is offline
  10. 09-16-2005 #10
    samikeyp
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    Anyone who says Bledsoe is a Cowboys homer. Brooks is a far better choice. Joe Horn, Dante Stallworth, Deuce McAllister all catch ball from him. He can scramble. Saints have a more vertical offense and he doesnt get sacked as much.
    Or they will say this because they are an anti-Cowboys homer.

    Fact is it all depends on your league and who the matchups are. Brooks has the potential of scoring more because of his running ability. However, in the four leagues I am in, Bledsoe outscored Brooks by an average of 34.43pts to 16.92. It is also just one week. The first couple of weeks of fantasy ball can be tough because no real trends have been established. I start Brooks only because I think he will be more productive against the Giants D than Bledsoe will be against Washington's.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote samikeyp is offline
  11. 09-16-2005 #11
    2pac
    Gangsta Photog 2pac's Avatar
    Post Count
    1,461
    Thanks for proving my point, batman.

    Joe Horn > Keyshawn Johnson
    Donte Stallworth > Terry Glenn (who could be injured again at any moment.)
    Az Hakim > Any other Cowboys WR
    Deuce can catch out of the backfield.
    Michael Lewis and Devry Henderson can come in to add another deep threat at any moment.
    The Saints mainly use TEs to block. This was even the case when they had Wesley Walls.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote 2pac is offline
  12. 09-16-2005 #12
    samikeyp
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    Your point was that Brooks was a better choice....Batmans was that Bledsoe was a better choice...here is his post....
    Bledsoe, Bledsoe has a far better receiving crew than Brooks, not to mention Jason Whitten as a tight end come on now.....Brooks just has Joe Horn nothing more nothing less...
    You talk about being injury prone, Glenn is but so is Donte Stallworth.....Hakim is a great [/sarcasm] receiver...which explains of course why he has been no better than the #3 guy in St. Louis and N.O. and couldn't even be the #1 in Detroit before the guys they have now got there. He is fast but has problems holding on to the ball.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote samikeyp is offline
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules