Reply With Quote
Is it allowable to use a tragedy to fearmonger on the political forum? Sure. Why not?
Is this allowable?
http://cqrcengage.com/act/app/sign-p...ementId=142773
Is it allowable to use a tragedy to fearmonger on the political forum? Sure. Why not?
Lol fear mongering. Are you scared now?
It is allowed when a Democrat is President.
I don't want them here either. As much as I don't like Christianity, and I don't, Islam is so much worse right now.
At least ing fingerprint them, register them and photograph them as well as question them.
exactly.
Phelps Baptist, gotta hate and fear all Christians.
Muslim Scholars Make the Theological Case Against the Islamic State
More than a hundred Muslim scholars and leaders from around the world released an open letter addressed to Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Wednesday, telling the self-proclaimed caliph, in no uncertain terms, that the group's use of Islamic scripture is illegitimate and perverse.
The do ent, which was issued in Arabic and English on the website Letter to Baghdadiand is embedded below, begins with a list of practices employed by the Islamic State (also known as ISIS or ISIL) that its authors say are explicitly forbidden by Islam. They include torture, slavery, forced conversions, the denial of rights for women and children, and the killing of innocents.
The letter emphasizes that Baghdadi's claims to a caliphate spanning eastern Syria and western Iraq are void.
"Who gave you authority over the ummah [Muslim people]?" the letter asks. "Was it your group? If this is the case, then a group of no more than several thousand has appointed itself the ruler of over a billion and a half Muslims. This at ude is based upon a corrupt circular logic that says: 'Only we are Muslims, and we decide who the caliph is, we have chosen one and so whoever does not accept our caliph is not a Muslim.' "
https://news.vice.com/article/muslim...-islamic-state
No, Muslims Are Not More Violent Than People of Other Religions. Here Are the Facts to Prove It.
I don’t figure that Muslims killed more than 2 million people or so in political violence in the entire twentieth century, and that mainly in the Iran-Iraq War 1980-1988 and the Soviet and post-Soviet wars in Afghanistan, for which Europeans bear some blame (the secular nationalist Young Turks also committed genocide against the Armenians during an invasion of eastern Anatolia by Russia).
Compare that to the Christian European tally of, oh, lets say 100 million (16 million in WW I, 60 million in WW II– though some of those were attributable to Buddhists in Asia– and millions more in colonial wars.)
Belgium– yes, the Belgium of strawberry beer and quaint Gravensteen castle– conquered the Congo and is estimated to have killed off half of its inhabitants over time, some 8 million people at least.
Or, between 1916-1930 Tsarist Russian and then Soviet forces — facing the revolt of Central Asians trying to throw off Christian (and then Marxist), European rule — Russian forces killed an estimated 1.5 million people.Two boys brought up in or born in one of those territories (Kyrgyzstan) just killed 4 people and wounded others critically.
That is horrible, but no one, whether in Russia or in Europe or in North America has the slightest idea that Central Asians were mass-murdered during WW I and before and after, and looted of much of their wealth. Russia when it brutally conquered and ruled the Caucasus and Central Asia was an Eastern Orthodox, Christian empire (and seems to be reemerging as one!).
Then, between half a million and a million Algerians died in that country’s war of independence from France, 1954-1962, at a time when the population was only 11 million!
I could go on and on. Everywhere you dig in European colonialism in Afro-Asia, there are bodies. Lots of bodies.
Now that I think of it, maybe 100 million people killed by people of European Christian heritage in the twentieth century is an underestimate.
Terrorism is a tactic of extremists within each religion, and within secular religions of Marxism or nationalism. No religion, including Islam, preaches indiscriminate violence against innocents.
It takes a peculiar sort of blindness to see Christians of European heritage as “nice” and Muslims and inherently violent, given the twentieth century death toll I mentioned above. Human beings are human beings and the species is too young and too interconnected to have differentiated much from group to group.
People resort to violence out of ambition or grievance, and the more powerful they are, the more violence they seem to commit. The good news is that the number of wars is declining over time, and World War II, the biggest charnel house in history, hasn’t been repeated.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/print...gions_20151115
Then of course their is the slaughter of millions, the CC's war on Amerindian drugs, forced conversion and enslavement of the Americas by the Catholic Spanish accompanied by, blessed by Catholic priests and monks.
No one reads your stupid article spam boutons.
... ignorant , reading will decrease your stupidity, ignorance.No one reads your stupid article spam boutons.
I always find it mind boggling how you can (rightfully) rail against Christians trying to take over the country and then turn a blind eye on how Islam has brought an extended dark ages to the middle east for hundreds of years now. I mean show some ing consistency got, instead of being a Democrat cheerleader. Algebra, astronomy, geometry, all of this comes from the middle east and Islam came wrecked the cradle of human civilization. It's something Neils deGrasse Tyson talks about all the time, how most of the stars have arabic names from an era where free thought and scholarship was encouraged in the middle east. And then how it ended under religion and the entire area has become a poverty stricken hole. He always uses it as a cautionary tale of what can happen here if this country embraces bull like intelligent design and young earth creationism and turns its back on science as blasphemy like the Islamic world did. Also, go your mother.
Like poor Americans, of all colors, being stupid, ignorant suckers for grifter pastors, End Timers who tell them to deny science, deny rationality, moving them back to pre-Enlightenment era, same is true of any religion's hucksters, grifters.
There are lots of poor areas, countries on planet that AREN'T Muslim (eg, US slave states, red states), and quite a few that are modern, sophisticated, advanced that are Muslim.
So who's -slapped ass needs extracting?
Bing what are you doing here? I thought I told you to go your mother.Like poor Americans, of all colors, being stupid, ignorant suckers for grifter pastors, End Timers who tell them to deny science, deny rationality, moving them back to pre-Enlightenment era, same is true of any religion's hucksters, grifters.
There are lots of poor areas, countries on planet that AREN'T Muslim (eg, US slave states, red states), and quite a few that are modern, sophisticated, advanced that are Muslim.
So who's -slapped ass needs extracting?
weak there, typical after The Great Boutons delivers a slapping
Weak is you ignoring the toxic effect Islam had in destroying the middle east. At least it's better than your re ed article spams though.
Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses -- but really only of they're Christian and preferably white (and even better still if they might eventually become republicans . . . .)
Will allow in:
FIFY. Dems just want to flood the country with illegals and let them vote (like California is doing) so they can get a permanent majority. They don't give a about how "tired" and "poor" they are, they just want the votes.
there's a large area free of any controlling political authority where Iraq used to be. by invading and toppling Saddam, the USA created a power vacuum and a zone of instability that has been an incubator for terrorism and which by now has spilled over into other countries.
don't we owe refugees from a war we essentially started in Iraq in 2003 and which continues to this day, asylum from the anarchy, chaos and suffering war causes?
who the let that psycho back in here?No one reads your stupid article spam boutons.
We don't owe them anything. Look at Europe - letting in these hundreds of thousands of refugees are forever going to change their countries - their language, their customs, the very fabric of what made them Germans, Italians, etc are going to be lost. The rest of us shouldn't have to suffer and support more people because of your GUILT. Obama would be better served putting more effort/resources into stamping out ISIS than bringing over thousands of people who are impossible to be vetted. Why do you think Saudi Arabia refuses to let even one of these refugees in? Because they care about and want to protect their citizen something this administration never had - they'd rather bring in the illegals, refugees, etc. all in the disguise of compassion when all they want is eventual votes. Look at Kate's law - something to protect us - but no, some bs excuse by Reid to let the illegal felons continue to roam these sanctuary cities.
Last edited by rmt; 11-16-2015 at 07:08 AM.
I'm OK with allowing a limited number of refugees in, as long as they are not believers in strict Sharia Law.
Let them know how America is different first. That women here are as free as men.
See how many of them still with to adhere to that.
I am for it as I said finger print them, photograph them, question them and only if they pass all those tests allow them in and track them for the next 3 years. If you can't do that, don't do it.
I didn't mention a religious test.
Sharia law isn't something all followers believe in.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
