Reply With Quote
PtR is ridiculous though. So I'm torn.
PtR is ridiculous though. So I'm torn.
I like Horford. But Spurs can't trade their best 3D player and get no one who can come close to fill the role in return. Simmons is nowhere near ready.
Do you really wanna be the team giving Horford a 5y/145m-150m contract? I bet the Spurs do not.
I know some fellows will call me a homer, but I wouldn't trade our starting SG locked up in a great contract for this season and the next 3 for an expiring 30 y/o Horford, who's gonna cost 150m to keep next season.
Even PtC is saying this is ridiculous and they're dumb as .
Next.
Spurs don't make it past GS without Green. Green really has owned Klay defensively if you look at their head to head numbers.
Green has been playing like his old self for the past month.
Horford is great, but he would be redundant of LMA and West. THIS YEAR, the Spurs need Green. I don't think the Spurs are looking to next year right now.
I like PTR. But yeah. What this guy said.
Man PtR, once a damn good site turned to a joke.
Pretty much sums it up.
Spurs can pursue Horford in the offseason without giving up major pieces, and only really need to do so if Duncan declines or decides to hang them up. Right now, the Spurs need perimeter D and shooting, not another big man to add to the glut of frontline players.
Pull the trigger RC. No one is beating the Dubs this season tbh
Is Horford really worth the massive Contract he'd get tho? And how would he mesh with LMA?
PtR
Basically a 'don't trade our role player for an All Star big in his prime' plea. Their reasoning for why it is a ridiculous deal is ridiculous too. It's obvious if the deal goes through ( close to zero chance of course ), then other pieces will be included - Boris, Korver, Thabo, or there would be another trade for a SG replacement so they wouldn't rely on Simmons that much and the roster would be more proportional.
But yeah, this deal isn't happening even on 2k.
Last edited by BG_Spurs_Fan; 02-16-2016 at 12:12 PM.
Timvp's brothers run that site don't they
I hope this doesn't mean Tim has told the front office this is his last year.
I mean, I hope so too. Because the Spurs are DONE for this year if they make this trade. I could totally see them losing the first round to a team like Dallas (though they'd obviously beat Portland or Utah) if they have to rely on Simmons carrying the two-guard spot. So yeah, Tim retires without a sixth ring. Would suck to know that now.I hope this doesn't mean Tim has told the front office this is his last year.
But this rumor doesn't have legs. PtR picking up gives it no credibility, even though they're broken-clocking it with their disapproval.
Here we go....another fake rumor from a site led Morning News USA. Not happening.
Regarding the comments about PTR- Pounding The Rock simply has a bunch of writers taking their personal time to write articles about the Spurs. Anyone here that wants to take the time to write multiple articles after every game and start a website for people to visit for free- they are welcome to do so. I'm personally glad for all the Spurs sites out there. It's nice to have the options. JR Wilco seems like a decent guy.
As for Horford, I'm sure the FO has looked at him to take the place of Tim. However losing Danny now, who has done quite well on Klay as someone mentioned, isn't a great idea. GSG!!
PtR doesn't stop sucking because it's free. SAG writes better articles than them, and they're like 95-percent pro-Anderson spin. , even Apa has higher-quality stuff, and I'm half-convinced he's trying to be bad most of the time.
Agreed. Ran into one of the guys who helps with the site at ACL. Cool dude, putting in their time to keep the site going is really cool of them.Regarding the comments about PTR- Pounding The Rock simply has a bunch of writers taking their personal time to write articles about the Spurs. Anyone here that wants to take the time to write multiple articles after every game and start a website for people to visit for free- they are welcome to do so. I'm personally glad for all the Spurs sites out there. It's nice to have the options. JR Wilco seems like a decent guy.
As for Horford, I'm sure the FO has looked at him to take the place of Tim. However losing Danny now, who has done quite well on Klay as someone mentioned, isn't a great idea. GSG!!
and yeah, losing Danny would be giving up one of the variables that gives the team a slimmer of hope at pulling the upset
There's another option for us to start there.
Hint: he has a big head
I don't want Magic anywhere near the team.
green should guard curry, kawhi can't handle him.
If anything we need more perimeter 3 And D players. The times, they are a changing.
Thanks. As much as everyone makes fun of my essays they like reading them I think.
Kawhitstorm I think makes me go blabbering on purpose!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
