Reply With Quote
You do realize that he's been only working with the shooting coach for a couple months and they're restructuring his form completely. It will be several months before you see the results of the coaching/practice.
I was really annoyed watching his play in the international games this past week. I mean he had some good games using his quickness and playmaking ability but his damn free throws are still awful. I really thought he would put in the time this summer and come back a 75% foul shooter this year, clearly that is not going to happen. I mean there is just no excuse for a 6-1, 6-2 pg to shoot around 65% for the season none at all. We can forgive Timmy for having a bad night from the line and shooting that % because he is dominant at everything else, he makes up for it. Tony still has a long way to go be an all star in the NBA a long way.
You do realize that he's been only working with the shooting coach for a couple months and they're restructuring his form completely. It will be several months before you see the results of the coaching/practice.
Actually, I wouldn't expect results that soon. If Parker is going to re-do his mechanics, he'll get worse before he gets better. My thinking is that if it works out, Parker's shot could be "fixed" in a couple years.
i honestly didnt see any change in his form watching today.
Im sure, if you showed film side by side, there would be HUGE differences. WHo knows.
Brewski will say thats an excuse and that you need to trade the young frenchie IMMEDIATELY!!My thinking is that if it works out, Parker's shot could be "fixed" in a couple years.
Most players don't develop a good jump shot in a matter of 2 months, it usually takes something closer to 12 months if they only need slight changes and often a lot more than that for someone who wants to get a whole new J. The amount of practice needed is phenominal.
Parker has already had his long range jumpshot changed in his NBA career, and it obviously hasn't worked out great. It would be very hard to change the way you like to shoot after shooting the same way for 7-8 years of professional basketball. Give dude some time.
Just curious. What NBA player can you think of that's totally reworked their shot and gone from a bad/mediocre shooter to a good shooter? Are shooters born or made?
Born.
If a coach has to change your shot, it normally doesn't work out right. It's your job as a player to adjust your shot by yourself. If he's going to change his mechanics after all these years, I don't think it will work out right.
Grant Hill and Tracy McGrady spring to mind.Just curious. What NBA player can you think of that's totally reworked their shot and gone from a bad/mediocre shooter to a good shooter? Are shooters born or made?
You'd probably find most players that have gone from being bad to good shooters haven't exactly remodeled there shot, but just fine tuned it and made simple adjustments that may not be that easy to spot just by looking at them shoot. Doesn't mean they haven't made big, important change though.
Bull .Born.
If a coach has to change your shot, it normally doesn't work out right. It's your job as a player to adjust your shot by yourself. If he's going to change his mechanics after all these years, I don't think it will work out right.
Jordan was a very average shooter and then he turned into one of the best midrange shooters ever.
"Grant Hill and Tracy McGrady"
... natural, graceful, well coordinated athletes, a hugely advantageous platform.
Tony isn't, he'll have a harder row to hoe in changing his mechanics, but he's gotta try. In the meantime, I'd like to see him shooting jumpers less, and concentrating on running the offense with 10 APG, driving like a madman, and keeping up his growth as a defender.
Grant Hill 94-95 to 04-05
FG% - .477; .462; .496; .452; .479; .489; .442*; .426*; .492; .509
3 FG% - .148; .192; .303; .143; .000; .347; 1.00*; .000*; .250; .231
* 4 games and 14 games
Tracy McGrady 97-98 to 04-05
FG% - .450; .436; .451; .457; .451; .417; .431
3 FG% - .341; .229; .277; .355; .364; .386; .339; .326
Prior to gametime, I've seen Parker make one handed shots from sitting in a chair courtside without any problem.
Most NBA players are excellent shooters.
The problem with most of them is between the ears.
Some guys just can't ever get it.
Maybe he needs to shoot form sitting in a chair.
It's hilarious. I've seen the dude do some things that are out of this world. He has the inside game of a hall of famer 7 footer, he has the dribbling skills of I. Thomas, but his free throws look like T. Wakefield. (Knuckleballer) But prior to gametime, he is usually automatic from anywhere on the court.
Same thing goes for Robert Horry.
But when the game is on, the difference is between the ears.
Late.
Am I going crazy, or did Sequ actually make a great point?
The guy that was unreal pre-game was Kerr. Swish, swish, swish, swish .....
FG% is misleading at times, McGrady wouldn't take a perimeter jumpshot early on I doubt he even took 1 3PA per game, now he is a good 3PT shooter and would attempt close to 6/7 a game, but the FG% says he has got worse. Tracy McGrady is a far superior shooter now than in his first 3 seasons, even if the stats don't show it. If anyone should know that it is Spurs fans, after what happened last season.Grant Hill 94-95 to 04-05
FG% - .477; .462; .496; .452; .479; .489; .442*; .426*; .492; .509
3 FG% - .148; .192; .303; .143; .000; .347; 1.00*; .000*; .250; .231
* 4 games and 14 games
Tracy McGrady 97-98 to 04-05
FG% - .450; .436; .451; .457; .451; .417; .431
3 FG% - .341; .229; .277; .355; .364; .386; .339; .326
Grant Hill's FG% has risen according to those stats, but even then they don't show the extent of the improvement on his jumpshot alone. He went from being very good offensively to being unstoppable thanks to his improved jumpshot opening up more driving lanes for him because defenders could no longer sag.
Bottom line is there is no stat to measure the improvement of the jumpshot by itself, only the FG% stat, but anyone who has watched those players at the start of there careers and then now, knows how it is.
I agree with Sequ that half of Tony's problem is in his head. Some games you see him right from tip-off and he has this focused look about him. He knows exactly when to drive and penetrate, when to dish out to the open man, when to push the ball up the court, how to get defenses to collapse on him, etc. Then, after he misses a shot or 2 or he gets a turnover or 2, you can just tell that he's lost some of that focus and confidence. Then he tries to force the game to come back to him and overthinks it all and tries way too hard.
I think Focus is the biggest problem with his game. That goes for his crappy FT's, his poor jumpshots, and even his TO's. How else can you explain how a guy can go from looking like a flawless, experienced basketball player one game scoring 20 and 7, and then go for 8 and 3 the next?
Whoa. Tony Parker isn't a graceful, natural athlete on the basketball court? Whatever.Grant Hill and Tracy McGrady"
... natural, graceful, well coordinated athletes, a hugely advantageous platform.
Tony isn't, he'll have a harder row to hoe in changing his mechanics, but he's gotta try. In the meantime, I'd like to see him shooting jumpers less, and concentrating on running the offense with 10 APG, driving like a madman, and keeping up his growth as a defender.
10 APG, how many NBA players have averaged that once in the last 10 years. I'll hazard a guess and say maybe 4/5. Nash, Kidd, Stockton, perhaps Rod Strickland and maybe someone out there I'm forgetting. Nash did it with the Suns, the fastest and most effective offensive team in Basketball. Stockton was Stockton, a once in a lifetime type player. Kidd has played for 3 fast paced, fast breaking, offensively orientated teams in that time period. Parker plays in a deliberate, post centered offense for a team that is generally middle of the pack offensively. No chance of 10apg.
The first three years McGrady was .2 of .6, .2 of .7 and .2 of .8 for his percentages on three point shooting. You could make a stronger case for statistical vagaries of a small sample and not getting enough shots to get a rhythm those first three years than that he improved his three point shooting. After that he's pretty much flatlined about where he was year one.
Personally on shooting I think for the most part numbers are numbers. Maybe he was played tighter, got more attention as he established himself but to make your case you have to go to second lines of defense. If true as Parker improved he would face the same obstacles.
Personally I think somebody can help with consistency of stroke, correct gross flaws but the majority of it is just inate hand eye coordination, visual perception stuff.
On a side note McGrady with a big man had his worse three point shooting year in ages. Where have we seen that before?
Most obvious example is Michael Redd, although he didn't exactly "rework" his shot so much.
Magic (and Jordan, as previously mentioned) also was a mediocre shooter who became a deadly clutch shooter.
Redd's three point shooting has gone from .444 to .438 to .350 to .355.
Best candidates I can find so far are LeBron who's gone from .290 to .350 and Johnson who was a career .350 or so to last year .478. Those could be one year phenomenas though, there are lots of those. If so Johnson picked a great year to do it.
Nearly every player in the league is like that. Look at the other point guards from game to game and they are just as inconsistent. Tony was a lot more consistent this past season than people give him credit for.How else can you explain how a guy can go from looking like a flawless, experienced basketball player one game scoring 20 and 7, and then go for 8 and 3 the next?
Tony's mechanics on his shot suck. Everything from thumb position to the angle of his elbow. Sure, sometimes he concentrates a little harder or is just lucky and he shoots better. But it's mainly a mechanics thing.
Jeff Hornacek had a funny spin to his shot early on in his career because his thumb on his shooting hand gave the ball a sideway spin. He worked a whole summer shooting jumpers with his thumb taped to his palm, and he became one of the best pure shooters in the league.
Kori is correct.
When we start seeing some backspin on Tony's shots, that's when you will know something has changed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
