Personally happens....so what if Curry is hurt and they don't win the le...
1st to 16 assholes!!!!
Obviously I'd prefer to beat GS full-strength as opposed to without Curry, but I'd sure as prefer to beat GS without Curry than lose to them at full-strength
As long as we ring I don't really give a tbh. Sucks for them and I'll certainly feel bad for Curry and the Warriors if he can't play, but I won't lose sleep over it if we end up winning as a result. Call it an asterisk le all you want, I'll still enjoy the out of it.
who cares?
Looking here, I see no asterisks:
http://www.nba.com/history/nba-season-recaps/index.html
Many fans.
GSW had been living a charmed existence for two seasons now. Sadly, this stuff is bound to happen. Look at Duncan in 2000.
wtf, we don't even know if Curry injury is that serious and we still have to go through OKC and people already speaking about * .... smh
Yup, and the Lakers' 2000 championship*
Referring to league as a whole..whoever wins it * will be there
Don't agree with that assessment but whatever
It has been written.
And so we're clear, if that does happen, the 2016 Spurs (or whoever wins this year, if it is not the Warriors) will displace the 2015 Warriors, who displaced the 2013 Heat, who displaced the 2011 Mavericks, who displaced the 2009 Lakers, who displaced the 2007 Spurs, who displaced the 2006 Heat, who displaced the 2000 Lakers, who displaced the 1999 Spurs, who displaced the 1994 and 1995 Rockets, who displaced the 1989 Pistons . . . . as the "Lucky Champions."
They can * all they want. What matters for me is theCan't speak for others though.
No greater ** in history then when the Rockets won 2 les while MJ was attempting baseball...Nobody here cares. happens and history is what it is.
I am nervous about OKC, not thinking Dubs yet.
That's all that matters.They can * all they want. What matters for me is the
So what? In any given year someone will always point to some injury or some other reason as evidence of a champion being undeserving. ...there are plenty of people that still view the Rockets championships as meaningless because Jordan quit for two years.
If the Warriors will admit to an asterisk for last season, then I'll follow suit.
The astericks only really hurt if you don't back up the championship the next year. Had the spurs defended their le in 2000 it'd be moot. Contra the Lakers don't get a 2000 asterisks because they repeated.
The 2007 le is similar.
The 2015 warriors asterisks won't be mentioned bc their regular season was record breaking. But failure to repeat will definitely dent their argument as a historically great team.
Folks rushing to * talk as if Curry is done for the year already and the Spurs are going to walk another 3 depleted- Grizzlies teams to a ring..
Warriors definitely get an * for last season. No Spurs, no OKC, and the Cavs not at full strength. I mean they played this same Rox team in the WCF! ***
spursfanz are so adorable.
Elian will be fine and will inject his 30w90 boy juice all inside us
The asterisks are imaginary and, in any event, don't hurt unless you choose to allow them to.
That's only like the fifth time today you've mentioned his . Way to confirm your gotry.
Elian will be fine and will inject his 30w90 boy juice all inside us
Let him keep saying it. Everyone knows that every time hater makes a prediction the exact opposite happens.
He'll be back, that's for sure. But his talent operates on such a slim margin that even Curry at 80% will be devastating to the Warriors. Their whole offense is predicated on him being stupid great. If he's just pretty good, suddenly no more wide open looks for Iggy/Thompson and no more 4 on 3 with Green at the top of the key.
I knew the * talk was coming.
what I dread the most is watching Draymond Green who will probably be over the top with his antics on the court.
Off the court, he's saying the right things now. But I suspect he'll be at the front of the line saying that "well, they didn't beat us at full strength"...."if Steph had been there"...etc
in this case, they are correct
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
