Reply With Quote
This obsession with GOAT is ridiculous. You have to always take the era and rules into consideration.
There are of course video's putting Spurs number 1 but even I don't agree with that (even though it is SUPER close)... If Parker was more like Stockton, they would be number 1 by far. Not really a Parker hater but if Parker was more of a traditional facilitator, they would be the best.
This video is pretty close to my top 10 and I like the criteria of only including the teams with "big 3" who have been together a while.
Do you agree with this vid?
Last edited by phyzik; 08-02-2016 at 08:06 PM.
This obsession with GOAT is ridiculous. You have to always take the era and rules into consideration.
That one that Horry made when CWEBB turned his back on him.
P.S., have you watched your children masturbate lately?
So then take the rules and era into consideration and give us your top 10.... This is a discussion board after all, there is no "right" answer to this.
Are you still watching your children masturbate?
Im not saying not to discuss it I just mean there is no such thing as the GOAT imho...unless we're talking about players then I think MJ is the easy answer. Big 2 is possibly debatable as well but not big 3.
Why not? I think in today's NBA it really does take a "Big 3" to win it all.... There has to be a reason the NBA as a whole is going that route after all.
Are you still watching your children masturbate?
Also, I'd like to see your "big 2" list....
Even though I despised them as opponents, Shaq and Kobe were the best duo in recent memory. Tim and David (Twin towers) are up there with them though. Number one Duo would be Stockton and Malone even though they never won the big game. Nash and Amare were pretty good as well although I'm not sure where to place them, probably not top 10 but they are worth mentioning.
Last edited by phyzik; 08-02-2016 at 09:31 PM.
Are you still watching your children masturbate?
I see Thread is a little more ornery than normal tonight....
No reason to pay attention to him, just let him be, He is making his own bed.
What do you think?
Is a "Big 3" relevant today or do you think a "Big 2" is still relevant in today's NBA?
fifyNo reason to pay attention to him, just let him be, He is making his own bed.
What do you think?
Is a "Big 3" relevant today or do you think a "Big 2" is still relevant intoday's NBA?
pretty much. I don't think 2 mega stars on a team can work in Todays NBA
It HAS to be a "Big 3" at this point. Kind of disgusting because I want to see some real compe ion in this league. I'm tired of just 3-5 teams (sometimes even 1-3 teams) being the indisputable favorites. Even if that includes the Spurs.
I think something needs to change, but I honestly don't know what needs to be done to fix it.
Seriously, have you watched your children masturbate lately?
You know it and I know it... In today's NBA
lol enrique part of big3...only big 3 is td, gino and backup pg who bailed his ass out of elimination games
Only case is longevity for Td Gino Tp. Otherwise it's gonna be Bulls, the other Bulls, Lebron wade bosh. They get results in a short period of time.
Td Gino Tp epitomizes teamwork.
You seem to conveniently misplace many years of failure when you offer up that one example of success, and you reach waaaaaay back into your closet to grab that garment with so many others right at your fingertips.
Porker and Manu left too many on the table. Subtract points.
Please. I lament our sufferings frequently and at length.
+ he stays there (where Adelman placed him) and it's different, all different.
Porker, according to his detractors never leaves "much on the table" ...
No you don't, that's a bald face lie. You've been on your back in an alley for going on 5 years and you're here talking about the Sacramento Kings as if this is Dallas and the Lakers are Jr.
My ass.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
