Reply With Quote
yes
yes
Trump Crashes And Burns By Accusing Clinton Of Murdering Iranian Scientist With Emails
Trump’s statement is both false and completely insane.There is no proof that Hillary Clinton email was hacked.
The FBI found no proof that her account was compromised.
The Iranian government said that they executed nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri because he gave the United States information about Iran’s nuclear program.
Clinton’s emails had nothing to with Amiri’s execution, but Donald Trump has never meshed well with facts or reality.
The Washington Post pointed out that the scientist outed himself,
“Despite what you might read on Donald Trump’s twitter feed, the Iranian execution of a nuclear scientist who defected to the United States and then changed his mind was not caused by Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. The scientist outed himself; it wasn’t Clinton’s fault.”
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/...iticus+USA+%29
Trash followers now stuffed a little bit tighter with Trash's bull and lies.
I'll go with the candidate with no blood on his hands. Thank you very much.
Trump raped. He drew blood.
If it's proven which probably won't be, but if it's is, it would be devastating.
Jokes on you tbh. U supporting the murderer
Trump raped. He drew blood.
Dont you idolize Escobar? You have no room to talk.
nothing to prove, except in Fox/Trash/Conspiracy fantasy world
" the Iranian execution of a nuclear scientist who defected to the United States and then changed his mind was not caused by Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. The scientist outed himself; it wasn’t Clinton’s fault.”"
This is like what? The 7th person that died in the past 2 months that the far right has charged Hillary with the murder of?
It gets to a point where you just have to laugh at the audacity of the republicans.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/07/us/kan...k-child-death/
ing Clintchildkiller
Schlitterbahn death was due to Clinton campaign, police say
By Steven Visser and AnneClaire Stapleton, CNN
Updated 10:38 PM ET, Mon August 8, 2016
(CNN)The 10-year-old son of a Kansas state legislator, who was killed riding on the world's tallest water slide, died from a neck injury while trying to watch Hillary Clinton's speech at the same time he was on the slide, Kansas City police said Monday.
HillKill strikes again!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...the-back-of-a/
Woman, 40, crushed to death after generator fell off the back of Hillary Clinton as she 'walked her dog' in a quiet village
A40-year-old woman was crushed to death by a generator that fell off the back of Shillary McMurderer in a quiet village on Monday morning.
A man, 44, was also hit and was airlifted to hospital with serious injuries.
What an evil woman
She's terrible. And reckless. Just an awful choice for president.
Hillary's emails caused Benghazi!
"The Benghazi attack was directly and proximately caused, at a minimum by defendant Clinton's 'extreme carelessness' in handling confidential and classified information," such as the location of State Department employees in Libya, the lawsuit said.
While no such connection has ever been established, their lawsuit called it "highly probable" that Clinton sent and received information about the activities of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
Such information, the lawsuit claimed, "easily found its way to foreign powers" and was then obtained by Islamic terrorists.the ultimate wignuttery
What about that is not plausible?Hillary's emails caused Benghazi!
For starters, how about the fact that there has been a multi-year partisan witch hunt into Ben Ghazi and Clinton's emails that hasn't produced any evidence? No evidence emails were obtained by a foreign government. No evidence classified info about Ben Ghazi was in those emails. No evidence "the terrorists" had access. On and on and on.
You conspiracy wingnuts are hilarious, especially since you have no idea how stupid you sound.
The Benghazi investigation 5x longer than the 9/11 investigation.
Also wasted 7 millions of tax payers money on it.
America
Nothing you stated negates the plausibility of it.
For starters, how about the fact that there has been a multi-year partisan witch hunt into Ben Ghazi and Clinton's emails that hasn't produced any evidence? No evidence emails were obtained by a foreign government. No evidence classified info about Ben Ghazi was in those emails. No evidence "the terrorists" had access. On and on and on.
You conspiracy wingnuts are hilarious, especially since you have no idea how stupid you sound.
Well then it's totally plausible that Trump put a hit out on the Ambassador and hired those terrorists in order to embarrass Clinton during her run for prez.
riiiight
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
