Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Uhoh

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...on-foundation/

    the Obama administration rejected requests from three FBI field offices that wanted to open public corruption cases involving the Clinton Foundation and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

    After banks alerted the field offices to su ious activity involving the Clinton family charity, the FBI wanted to investigate conflicts of interest stemming from foreign donations during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, CNN reported.

  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,176
    might get more attention if the GOP nominee wasn't setting himself on fire every other day.

  3. #3
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    might get more attention if the GOP nominee wasn't setting himself on fire every other day.
    Just because MSM news channels aren't reporting it doesn't mean it is not getting plenty of attention.

  4. #4
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    26,183
    Just because MSM news channels aren't reporting it doesn't mean it is not getting plenty of attention.

    living in a no nothing conspiracy theory echo chamber

  5. #5
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    living in a no nothing conspiracy theory echo chamber
    You keep claiming conspiracy despite the fact there are emails proving the MSM is in the Democrats pocket. It's not even debatable at this point.

  6. #6
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,176
    Just because MSM news channels aren't reporting it doesn't mean it is not getting plenty of attention.
    you're wrong about that, they have. your hypothesis is easily disproven by a couple of mouse clicks.

  7. #7
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    you're wrong about that, they have. your hypothesis is easily disproven by a couple of mouse clicks.
    so it is getting attention and you've proven your own hypothesis wrong.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    House Republicans Break The Law By Leaking Classified Clinton FBI Interview Info

    There are already reports that House Republicans are leaking classified information from Hillary Clinton's FBI interview in violation of federal law.

    Everyone knew that House Republicans were going to leak the classified information.

    The FBI was so sure that House Republicans were going to leak the information that they sent a warning along with the notes from Clinton’s interview that the information was classified.

    The whole point behind the Republican desire to get the material was to try to drum up a new scandal that will take the focus off of Donald Trump and his imploding presidential campaign.

    House Republicans have been using the edited leak strategy to put out bits of misleading and out of context information since they took back the House majority.

    They are on an endless quest to manufacture scandals.

    House Republicans spent years trying to create an Obama scandal, and after those efforts failed, they’ve turned their attention to Hillary Clinton.

    Ironically, the party that is claiming that Hillary Clinton broke the law by transmitting classified information over private email is breaking the law by knowingly leaking classified information to friendly media sources.

    http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/17/house-republicans-break-law-leaking-classified-clinton-fbi-interview-info.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&ut m_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politicu s+USA+%29



  9. #9
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,145
    House Republicans Break The Law By Leaking Classified Clinton FBI Interview Info

    There are already reports that House Republicans are leaking classified information from Hillary Clinton's FBI interview in violation of federal law.

    Everyone knew that House Republicans were going to leak the classified information.

    The FBI was so sure that House Republicans were going to leak the information that they sent a warning along with the notes from Clinton’s interview that the information was classified.

    The whole point behind the Republican desire to get the material was to try to drum up a new scandal that will take the focus off of Donald Trump and his imploding presidential campaign.

    House Republicans have been using the edited leak strategy to put out bits of misleading and out of context information since they took back the House majority.

    They are on an endless quest to manufacture scandals.

    House Republicans spent years trying to create an Obama scandal, and after those efforts failed, they’ve turned their attention to Hillary Clinton.

    Ironically, the party that is claiming that Hillary Clinton broke the law by transmitting classified information over private email is breaking the law by knowingly leaking classified information to friendly media sources.

    http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/17/house-republicans-break-law-leaking-classified-clinton-fbi-interview-info.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&ut m_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politicu s+USA+%29


    Please link to the information they leaked. Where is it?

  10. #10
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    Its from the moonbat rss. Accuracy is not essential.

  11. #11
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,176
    so it is getting attention and you've proven your own hypothesis wrong.
    not at all. your hypothesis that it went uncovered by the MSM is wrong.

  12. #12
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,176
    the claim that the MSM doesn't cover this or that is wrong nearly all of the time.

    posters who say so usually hear it from sources that reprint the primary MSM reporting, or heard it straight from the horse's mouth, then turn around like dramatic look prairie dog and say the MSM won't touch it.

    which are you?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •