This entire Love & Financial Scandal that Jim is embroiled in should be turned into a sitcom. As I reported earlier... the authorities arrested Charlie Hustle yesterday for ing Jim out of 25 million in cash on some bogus investments. Hustle bailed out immediately with what appears to be left over money from what he borrowed/ ed Jim out of. As we take a closer look...
“Over the course of 17 years, I invested in a series of opportunities presented by Charles Banks, on his assurance that we were working together for my family's long-term financial security,” Duncan said in a statement released at the time the lawsuit was filed. “Banks exploited my good intentions and our relationship for his personal gain and my substantial loss. I'm saddened that my name will join the list of athletes to fall victim to this sort of misconduct.”
"Last summer, Duncan told reporters that he had lost $25 million in investments due to Banks. The former NBA All Star alleged that Banks had “hustled” him to invest in wineries and investment funds."
So its safe to conclude that Jim didn't give a rats ass to who was dipping in his cookie jar. What I find odd is this quote right here...
"In January 2015, Duncan filed a lawsuit seeking at least $1 million in damages against Banks, claiming that he had been cheated in his investments."
Now why would Jim file a law suit for only one million dollars against Charlie Hustle when Hustle is reported to have taken over 25 million. Could it be possible that Jim confused Hustle with his wifes latin lover, Gil? As we already know... it was Gil that talked Amy into giving him 1 million to start a cross fit gym right in Jim's own backyard. Has Jim gone senile.. along with being stupid, gullible, re ed, and just plain ol dumb? I'm seriously trying to make sense of this guys... help me out.
http://www.fa-mag.com/news/former-ad...aud-28962.html
"at least $1m in damages" is not "only $1m"
This is what happens when a paki that flunked calculus tries to take on economics and law. Read the damn piece, it's all there where the "at least $1m" is coming from.
Charlie Catcher getting sued by the SEC too
TD just GOAT on and off the court...
And that work he put in taming your gag reflex is paying huge dividends now as you repeatedly and hungrily welcome his visitor into your open arena of a hole.
I normally don't even respond to low totem pole sitters like you, but since you've designated yourself Jim's personal nutsack carrier... why don't you please tell us why Jim didn't sue for "at least" 25 million? That is how much he was ed for, right? And why not sue Gil? You would think a man would sue the man who ed his wife, split his family, stole his pussy and a cool 1 million would have to pay something back, right? Nope... Jim says nothing."at least $1m in damages" is not "only $1m"
This is what happens when a paki that flunked calculus tries to take on economics and law. Read the damn piece, it's all there where the "at least $1m" is coming from.
Charlie Catcher getting sued by the SEC too
TD just GOAT on and off the court...
"at least $1m in damages" is not "only $1m"
This is what happens when a paki that flunked calculus tries to take on economics and law. Read the damn piece, it's all there where the "at least $1m" is coming from.
Charlie Catcher getting sued by the SEC too
TD just GOAT on and off the court...Spunky Mignon
Homie..why do you keep leaving off the 1 million loss on the women's make-up deal?
http://www.expressnews.com/news/loca...ng-6618495.php
Tammy s didn't protect his bank account, his wife, chilluns or asshole....
"I normally don't respond", then you respond. This is why your gotry shows on every post, and can't shed the pussy bitter asian male, naruto loving got label.
And no, you don't directly sue for investment loses, you sue for damages on fraud, which is what you have evidence of, as detailed in the article you yourself posted. You then let the SEC sue in civil court for fraudulent investments, and then part of that money goes to the investors that were wronged. See: https://www.sec.gov/answers/recoverfunds.htm
Furthermore, once Charlie Catcher declares bankruptcy after going to jail, his assets will be liquidated, like any bankruptcy proceedings and Tim will cash in again, plus the damages.
Extremely poor people like you don't understand how any of this work, that's why you keep pushing this having now idea how good it makes Tim look
He'll likely not only recover his $25m, plus make money on top.
And why would he sue that other got? He got to keep all his money and his kids. That's win-win on a divorce proceeding.
what a ing loser
And no, you don't directly sue for investment loses, you sue for damages on fraud, which is what you have evidence of, as detailed in the article you yourself posted. You then let the SEC sue in civil court for fraudulent investments, and then part of that money goes to the investors that were wronged. See: https://www.sec.gov/answers/recoverfunds.htm
Furthermore, once Charlie Catcher declares bankruptcy after going to jail, his assets will be liquidated, like any bankruptcy proceedings and Tim will cash in again, plus the damages.
Extremely poor people like you don't understand how any of this work, that's why you keep pushing this having now idea how good it makes Tim look
He'll likely not only recover his $25m, plus make money on top.
And why would he sue that other got? He got to keep all his money and his kids. That's win-win on a divorce proceeding.
Shut da up shawty...damages on fraud are 25 million exactly what he gave...additional investment losses equate to the losses on top of the 25 million... That cuck and got ain't getting back
Ethered tbh
And no, you don't directly sue for investment loses, you sue for damages on fraud, which is what you have evidence of, as detailed in the article you yourself posted. You then let the SEC sue in civil court for fraudulent investments, and then part of that money goes to the investors that were wronged. See: https://www.sec.gov/answers/recoverfunds.htm
Furthermore, once Charlie Catcher declares bankruptcy after going to jail, his assets will be liquidated, like any bankruptcy proceedings and Tim will cash in again, plus the damages.
Extremely poor people like you don't understand how any of this work, that's why you keep pushing this having now idea how good it makes Tim look
He'll likely not only recover his $25m, plus make money on top.
And why would he sue that other got? He got to keep all his money and his kids. That's win-win on a divorce proceeding.
Dayum I've never seen ElNono go HAM like he's doing on these Laker s in here
Just leaving you some room to come in here to eat, homie.Homie..why do you keep leaving off the 1 million loss on the women's make-up deal?
http://www.expressnews.com/news/loca...ng-6618495.php
Not to interrupt the pooflinging but not sure Tim will get all that money back. Even if they rule in Tim's favor a lot of the winners never see the full amount awarded in court. But i only took pre-law so i could be wrong ...
And no, you don't directly sue for investment loses, you sue for damages on fraud, which is what you have evidence of, as detailed in the article you yourself posted. You then let the SEC sue in civil court for fraudulent investments, and then part of that money goes to the investors that were wronged. See: https://www.sec.gov/answers/recoverfunds.htm
Furthermore, once Charlie Catcher declares bankruptcy after going to jail, his assets will be liquidated, like any bankruptcy proceedings and Tim will cash in again, plus the damages.
Extremely poor people like you don't understand how any of this work, that's why you keep pushing this having now idea how good it makes Tim look
He'll likely not only recover his $25m, plus make money on top.
And why would he sue that other got? He got to keep all his money and his kids. That's win-win on a divorce proceeding.
Wow... wow!!! Your love/hate relationship for catching my farts have destroyed every ounce of common sense you were born with. A large percentage of athletes are scammed out of wealth throughout their careers. None of them recoup what was stolen, you jackass. I dare you... find one that got back what he got ed out of. You think Charlie Hustle didn't anticipate his slush fund with Jim would come to an end? You think Hustle doesn't have off shore accounts?
And no, you don't directly sue for investment loses, you sue for damages on fraud, which is what you have evidence of, as detailed in the article you yourself posted. You then let the SEC sue in civil court for fraudulent investments, and then part of that money goes to the investors that were wronged. See: https://www.sec.gov/answers/recoverfunds.htm
Furthermore, once Charlie Catcher declares bankruptcy after going to jail, his assets will be liquidated, like any bankruptcy proceedings and Tim will cash in again, plus the damages.
Extremely poor people like you don't understand how any of this work, that's why you keep pushing this having now idea how good it makes Tim look
He'll likely not only recover his $25m, plus make money on top.
And why would he sue that other got? He got to keep all his money and his kids. That's win-win on a divorce proceeding.
The only thing Jim will get ks a swift kick in the ass come court date. Maybe he can make a few bucks with a tell all book or some . He's ed... get over it.
That's why I said likely not for sure, tbh... The real question here is how much are those companies worth when they get liquidated if he doesn't settle. Charlie Catcher also did investments with KG, and one would surmise other wealthy clients.
The criminal case is huge though, it forces him to either settle (which would likely include paying back ill gotten goods + damages) or face the music.
Dude is done, basically.
You 'don't respond', but then you continue to do so, and I'm the fart catcher? Stinky curry eater mad as ...
You can't even tell what damages are, but now you're Charlie Catcher financial advisor?
Shut the up, this whole thing is way over your head. Go back to Kohona and grab a book about calculus one of these days, tbh...
Charlie will likely do a plea bargain and he better hope he has the money to pay back or he's going to be picking up soaps in prison like your dad, tbh...
Last time I checked... the SEC doesn't send criminals to jail. Just ask your government officials and bankers. Jim will be filing for BK soon. Then all what you're spewing will be pointless.You 'don't respond', but then you continue to do so, and I'm the fart catcher? Stinky curry eater mad as ...
You can't even tell what damages are, but now you're Charlie Catcher financial advisor?
Shut the up, this whole thing is way over your head. Go back to Kohona and grab a book about calculus one of these days, tbh...
Charlie will likely do a plea bargain and he better hope he has the money to pay back or he's going to be picking up soaps in prison like your dad, tbh...
"A separate federal criminal indictment, identifying the client as “T.D.,” charges Banks with two counts of wire fraud.
Banks was arrested on Friday in San Antonio, Texas, where he was arraigned in federal court before posting bond, according to an Associated Press report."
That's a separate criminal lawsuit, on top of TD's own + the SEC civil lawsuit.
You might want to learn to read before posting again, got...
"A separate federal criminal indictment, identifying the client as “T.D.,” charges Banks with two counts of wire fraud.
Banks was arrested on Friday in San Antonio, Texas, where he was arraigned in federal court before posting bond, according to an Associated Press report."
That's a separate criminal lawsuit, on top of TD's own + the SEC civil lawsuit.
You might want to learn to read before posting again, got...
You keep ignoring the facts. Jim got ed and won't be getting any money back. I don't see why the SEC even bothered to get involved. My Hustle has offshore accounts.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
