Reply With Quote
I say they win no less than 60
I say they win no less than 60
About what I'm predicting: 55 wins.
I cant seem to spot an obvious number to go over or under.
OKC under and Memphis over is all I can think off but Im not sure either.
If Memphis is healthy, they can have another one of their ty mediocre season with over 45 wins.
Atlanta over is a decent bet too. imo.
Under for the Spurs. Maybe like 45 wins
Over. 60+ wins.
58 wins seems about right, definitely over. OKC at 45.5 seems high, I really don't think they are going to be much better than 41-41
Spurs Over 56.5
Utah Under 47.5
OKC Over 45.5
ATL Over 43.5
All Locks. Put your bets in now, thank me later.
I don't bet but these are all 100s.
Wonder if I can paraly futures? Any place that does that? Pinnacle? I know 5 dimes doesnt.
Yeah..I have OKC winning less than 42..probably not even make the playoffs.
Spurs Over
Utah Over ( 50 wins so long as they aren't decimated by injuries like last season)
OKC Under ( closer to 41-41)
ATL Over
OKC will be around 10-15 games over .500. Love what they did considering the loss of Durant and Ibaka. Joffrey addition was great, Oladipo + Sabonis + Ersan for Ibaka was solid. Westbrook gets an up in usage. They'll be better than people think.
Don't forget the refs.
I feel like Minnesota won't win 42 games and I feel like Houston will win at least 42 games based on being all offence.
Spurs will max out at 58 games. This is going to be a transition year.
Do all the bets have the same odds in this format...?
Spurs are projected to have same number of wins as the current world champs?
Depending on the defense we can do better
Spurs - 62 wins... This league is trash
http://www.si.com/nba/2016/10/19/san...si_google_news
Didn't want to create a new thread for this. Generally consensus but Sports Illustrated preview of Spurs for the season:
They'll be really good because they'll be well-coached and well-managed, and Kawhi is great. But do I think they're a championship team with Kawhi as their best player and Lamarcus as their second best player? Without someone else emerging, probably not. Definitely not in a league where the Warriors have the best team of all time. You know, that makes it hard. ... I think they'll have a good team, though. They'll win high-50s. But they were secretly a ing juggernaut last year, and I don't think they'll be quite as good with this group ... No, they don't have a shot against the Warriors, but no one does. Not even close."
OKC still has a solid team, I would be tempted to take the over. Westbrook would have to stay healthy though.
Adams and Kanter should be able to continue improving since they're still pretty young and Oladipo can at least take some playmaking and scoring pressure off Westbrook. It's crazy that KD left such a young and talented team.
Pretty accurate.They'll be really good because they'll be well-coached and well-managed, and Kawhi is great. But do I think they're a championship team with Kawhi as their best player and Lamarcus as their second best player? Without someone else emerging, probably not. Definitely not in a league where the Warriors have the best team of all time. You know, that makes it hard. ... I think they'll have a good team, though. They'll win high-50s. But they were secretly a ing juggernaut last year, and I don't think they'll be quite as good with this group ... No, they don't have a shot against the Warriors, but no one does. Not even close."
Old backcourt and lack of depth can't beat a team replete with All-Stars.
The league this year is even worse than it was last year, believe it or not
OKC is done. The ing Jazz look like the favorites to be the 4th seed lmfao. The East is still terrible.
League is polarized. There are very strong teams, strong teams and rest. In west there is probably no difference between 7th and 13th team. In east there are Cavs, Celtics, couple playoff team like Toronto, Atlanta, Bulls and rest.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
