https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...se-strategist/
Criticism of him from former Breitbarter Ben Shapiro: http://www.dailywire.com/news/8441/i...on-ben-shapiro
As far as I can tell, the only "source" for him being a white nationalist is that his scorned ex-wife said he didn't like Jews during a divorce hearing. This is the same "logic" that the Lakers trolls use in the NBA Forum when they call Tim Duncan gay.
But yeah, I'm sure Andrew Breitbart, a Jewish man, would have handed the reins of his company to someone who hates all Jews.
You only write that many paragraphs about someone if you have an axe to grind.
Every new source picked a side and somehow this one is the one that can not be tolerated.
I have a feeling home boy up there had some unfinished business with Bannon.
You're the guy that calls NBA players "monkeyballers" all the time and had as your avatar for like several years a pic of a monkey dribbling a basketball, right? Or am I thinking of someone else?
Anyone care to explain to me why nationalist seems like a dirty word - wouldn't seem so from the official definition.
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you to hear that the never-Trumper's have a problem with people he's selecting for his cabinet. Especially ex-employee types who obviously have a personal axe to grind.
Stormfront beginning to sound like a group of Washington insiders now: https://twitter.com/AmandaBecker/sta...13929251373056
What's more likely?
a.) ...that both Andrew Breitbart (a Jewish man) and Donald Trump (who has multiple Jewish family members) somehow allowed a white nationalist to worm his way into their inner circles without noticing or caring?
OR
b.) ...that the same so-called "journalists" who just spent over a year lying about Trump's chances of winning are now lying about his staff appointments?
Here's a protip: if a story fits the dominant narrative a little too closely, and it's spread by people with every incentive to lie and zero incentive to be honest, it should be taken with a grain of salt until concrete proof comes out to back it up. And by "concrete proof," I don't mean accusations from a divorce hearing dug up by legacy media outlets who are angry that their compe ion is getting a leg up under this administration.
I don't address red herrings.
White nationalist....TBH......Bannon seems to be a proud member of the Alt-right movement....
How Donald Trump's New Campaign Chief Created an Online Haven for White Nationalists
Breitbart News is "the platform for the alt-right," boasts Stephen Bannon.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...breitbart-newsWe're the platform for the alt-right," Bannon told me proudly when I interviewed him at the Republican National Convention (RNC) in July. Though disavowed by every other major conservative news outlet, the alt-right has been Bannon's target audience ever since he took over Breitbart News from its late founder, Andrew Breitbart, four years ago. Under Bannon's leadership, the site has plunged into the fever swamps of conservatism, cheering white nationalist groups as an "eclectic mix of renegades," accusing President Barack Obama of importing "more hating Muslims," and waging an incessant war against the purveyors of "political correctness."
oh, I see, have to have "white" before it - duh.
I don't really trust Ben Shapiro to tell the whole truth either, but anyone who has visited Breitbart knows that there is an obvious editorial appeal to white supremacy. It's disingenuous, dishonest race-baiting garbage appealing to the lowest common denominator. No one who has so much as written a comment on that website has any business sniffing the White House.
If that were the case, they wouldn't have a full-time bureau in Jerusalem reporting on anti-Semitism and stories that affect Israel.
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/
Breitbart was founded by a Jewish man, its CEO is Jewish, and many of its writers are Jewish. I highly doubt any of them have ever tried to appeal to people who hate them.
Last edited by Clipper Nation; 11-14-2016 at 04:27 PM.
Why are so many lib ed threads started in Spurstalk?
There is also a section called "Black Crime."
You can be a White Supremacist and be pro-Israel.
They aren't just pro-Israel, they're also against anti-Semitism and have a Jewish CEO and a bunch of Jewish writers. Doesn't sound very white supremacist to me. Unless you think they're all a bunch of real-life Clayton Bigsbys, the accusation makes zero sense.
But hey, keep flinging around every -ist, -ism and -phobe you can think of at anyone who disagrees with you. It worked so well for you guys this past election.
Some Breitbart headlines:
How convenient that the byline is cropped out. This article was written by Daniel Horowitz, who is Jewish himself.Some Breitbart headlines:
Quoted directly from the article:
All these dishonesties and flim-flam excuses pale by comparison with the consequences Kristol and his “Never Trump” cohorts are willing to risk by splitting the Republican vote. Obama has provided America’s mortal enemy, Iran, with a path to nuclear weapons, $150 billion dollars, and the freedom to develop intercontinental ballistic missiles to deliver the lethal payloads. Trump has promised to abandon the Iran deal, while Hillary Clinton and all but a handful of Democrats have supported this treachery from start to finish. Kristol is now one of their allies.
I am a Jew who has never been to Israel and has never been a Zionist in the sense of believing that Jews can rid themselves of Jew hatred by having their own nation state. But half of world Jewry now lives in Israel, and the enemies whom Obama and Hillary have empowered — Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, ISIS, and Hamas — have openly sworn to exterminate the Jews. I am also an American (and an American first), whose country is threatened with destruction by the same enemies. To weaken the only party that stands between the Jews and their annihilation, and between America and the forces intent on destroying her, is a political miscalculation so great and a betrayal so profound as to not be easily forgiven.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...-renegade-jew/
Why are you stuck on the Jewish angle? Are you under the impression that Jews are the only group of people that White Supremacists oppose? I honestly have no idea if they're antisemitic or not, but I've seen enough to know they definitely have an angle when it comes to race and crime.
I'm not. I'm saying Breitbart, specifically, is racist and many other -ists.But hey, keep flinging around every -ist, -ism and -phobe you can think of at anyone who disagrees with you. It worked so well for you guys this past election.
Look, I know you're an avid Breitbart reader, so I'm not going to fight all that hard trying to convince you that it's sensationalist hate-porn targeted to angry, under-educated white people. I know you'll keep reading it anyway.
But for someone who breaks a blood vessel every time Shaun King's name is mentioned, it's interesting that you're so quick to semen shield for people who are every bit as dishonest from the opposing side.
lol. It's gonna be another great week of tasting dem tears if they're going to double and triple down on the butthurt every time Trump picks a member for his staff that they don't personally approve of. Sorry libs, but you don't get to pick the Presidents staff either.
European Union chief Jean Claude Juncker has branded borders the “worst invention ever” in an astonishing blast. The bureaucrat slapped down calls for tougher frontier controls on the Continent despite growing fury over the fallout from the migrant crisis. And he called for more “solidarity” with refugees and their children. Speaking in Austria he said: “We have to fight against nationalism, we have the duty not to follow populists but to block the avenue of populists. “Borders are the worst invention ever made by politicians.”
So they will continue to throw tantrums.lol. It's gonna be another great week of tasting dem tears if they're going to double and triple down on the butthurt every time Trump picks a member for his staff that they don't personally approve of. Sorry libs, but you don't get to pick the Presidents staff either.
I don't see anyone ing about Preibus.
Because you were stuck on the angle that a website operated and staffed primarily by people who white supremacists hate is "pandering to white supremacists."
Do they race-bait for clicks? Sure, but there's a huuuuuuuuge difference between that and, like, Stormfront or something. But as long as the loud majority on the left keeps ignoring all nuance and shades of grey towards anyone who disagrees with them politically, they will continue to lose elections.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
