Last edited by Spurtacular; 11-26-2016 at 06:21 AM.
Even if 2 of the 3 states magically turn, he still gets to 270.
And if 3 of 3 magically turn? That's what has people upset. This looks like outright shenanigans.
70.6K (PA) is a lot bigger difference to overcome than 27.2K or 11.6K.
Democrats will blatantly cheat at any opportunity. This is just a chance for them to rig something up; people know this. Nobody's worried about a legitimate recount gone awry.
They are also using death threats to try to persuade electors to switch and it for Hillary. These people are evil and playing with ing fire
Link?
U elected the fat orange fraud turd!
There ain't nothing out there except for the far right versions of thinkprogress.borg et al.
Last edited by TeyshaBlue; 11-26-2016 at 08:57 PM.
Cmon folks let's go get it together and keep up
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/new...eats/94003176/
Kockistan WI recount pointless. Cheating repugs with rigged machines, no paper trail
The Left pulled this before in Minnesota where Norm Coleman won, then they magically "found" enough votes to push that hack Franken on us. I figured they were prepping thatRussians meme for a reason.
then add in WI voter suppression number of voters denied well exceeds trash's margin of victory
Muh suppression
Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts
An election fraud complaint has been filed with the Wisconsin Elections Commission after it was uncovered that more people voted in the presidential race than the total number of votes in 4 precincts in Wisconsin.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/11/26/election-fraud-complaint-filed-people-voted-total-voters-4-wisconsin-precincts.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=fe ed&utm_campaign=Feed:%20politicususa/fJAl%20(Politicus%20USA%20)
Dude calm down. If it were one state I would maybe be concerned. Three states where one is close to a 100k vote difference. This is nothing more than Stein trying to get more limelight.
I'll calm down when the shenanigans are over. I have zero faith in anyone on the left doing the right thing. Something smells like
Repubs should call for a recount in Florida.
Your remark is a fine example of just why fake news can be so easily spread.
You just dismissed the story because of the source. That means that you'd more likely accept the story if the source were more to your liking.
So instead of weighing the story on merit, you just used a pass/fail criteria based on preferred news sources.
when a source shreds its own credibility with falsity after falsity, i have no reason to take it seriously. same reason we discredit wild cobra's "science" takes. and yes, i'd be more likely to accept a story if the source were more credible
She's trying to do a few things (and it's really not her, she's just the face of it. There are other players who prefer to remain behind the scenes).
1. Get her name out there for campaign funding drives
2. Change the notion that Trump kicked the out of Hillary. Even a closer race would lend more legitimacy to the popular vote red herring and give the voter base something to cling to for 2020.
3. Affect the midterm elections
4. Endear herself to the Clintons/Dems
Well, for one thing, Infowars wasn't being referenced as the source. Soros-as-puppetmaster is just a common trope among the Infowars believers.
Secondly, Infowars does not pass the litmus to even qualify for pass/fail testing. Your presumption that anything on the Internet COULD be true, even if it comes from a source that is usually wrong, is a better example of how fake news spreads.
But I suspect you know this.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)