Which of the following would improve our team the most?

[N0 LyF3 ScRuB]

Pick from the poll, tbh..

[SpursBig3s]

Easy, Pau for Draymond. I ing hate that guy, but his versatility, playmaking, and ability to defend multiple positions would definitely make us better. Aldridge is the perfect "small ball" 5 in today's game. Draymond's numbers would probably go down a little bc the talent level wouldn't be as good as the Dubs, but the bball IQ is higher, and still good talent. Something to note would be the difference in floor gravity and space for him to operate playing with Parker instead of Curry.

Parker for Conley would be next, but u can't trust Conley to stay healthy. Imagine Patty, Bertans, Simmons, and aNd Dedmon playing with a versatile playmaker like Draymond. Draymond and Manu on the court at the same time would be fun to watch.

[NameLess Scrub]

Draymond could lose his hacking and moving screen privileges, and get more techs if he gets out of the Warriors.
It's too risky

[SpursforSix]

Man...as much as the Spurs need a PG, the Conley contract makes it too risky with his age and injury history.

[GSH]

So... it's a choice between:

Swapping our starting C for a 6'7" SF/PF (and we already have a very good SF and PF)
Swapping our very good PF for another C - one who is ripping down 6.0 boards per game. And we have two other 7-footers.
Or... replacing Parker.

It's almost like you're steering us toward one of the choices. But which?

[$pursDynasty]

So... it's a choice between:

Swapping our starting C for a 6'7" SF/PF (and we already have a very good SF and PF)
Swapping our very good PF for another C - one who is ripping down 6.0 boards per game. And we have two other 7-footers.
Or... replacing Parker.

It's almost like you're steering us toward one of the choices. But which?

Truth Nuke, would you prefer Cancer, Aids or ...a New Car!!! Looks like a straw man argument for sure. who wants Draymond, most wanted LTrain over Marc, and there is a the hate Parker crew . What would improve the Spurs the most is a guaranteed scorer for the bench, instant dependable offense like Manu used to be and how our broken microwave used to be as well. Spurs a bit too top heavy. Our starters a very good we just need another stud to make our bench something to be feared again. So while not voting in the poll I say none of the above.

[dabom]

So... it's a choice between:

Swapping our starting C for a 6'7" SF/PF (and we already have a very good SF and PF)
Swapping our very good PF for another C - one who is ripping down 6.0 boards per game. And we have two other 7-footers.
Or... replacing Parker.

It's almost like you're steering us toward one of the choices. But which?

I would trade porker for another ring. We would be the undeniable favorites.

[dabom]

Worry about the contracts later.