Aldridge, Dedmon, Kawhi and green have a plus 18 tho.
This is supposed to be our second best player and the complementary punch to Kawhi..
The metrics never loved him but his impact or lack thereof has been joke as of late outside defensive anchoring..
"All Star" my ass..those numbers are just too damning..
![]()
Aldridge, Dedmon, Kawhi and green have a plus 18 tho.
And Spurs are better with everyone off the court except Kawhi and Lee. Trade everyone.![]()
Is OP the biggest Cuck in Spurs history?
Blake![]()
God damn those stats are alarming. The entire team outside Kawhi and Lee have been net negatives the past month.
Look at the gap between him and Manu..
Can OP please go into detail what this means for the future? We need a take.
O you never give them out. You just a 2017 version of SPURraider![]()
Nah OP is just a little scared got. Stay downstairs kid. You gonna get hurt up here.![]()
OP just showed us some stats. Let's see if he can make something out of it.![]()
Waiting to see how Harlem spins this.![]()
Spin what? Harlem is a (the) leading Aldridge hater in here..
OP is shook like a little .![]()
Nah, it just states that any lineups without Kawhi or Lee are net negatives. That doesn't mean everyone else has a negative impact. Pau and Nico are the control since neither have played during this period, so it's more like anyone above them has had a "net negative impact". Which leaves 4 players with a net positive impact: Kawhi, Lee, Dedmon and Murray.
Exactly. The team hasn't been good in the past month, so of course it's going to reflect poorly on most of them individually, especially the guy who's probably played the most minutes (considering Leonard has sat out more games). He obviously needs to be significantly better, but the idea that this means he shouldn't have been an All-Star (again, past the obvious names, it's always been about reputation and team success), is nonsense. Opposing coaches aren't spending time digging through data like this to select All-Star reserves and his play has gotten significantly worse since the selections were made.
He has probably just played the worse relative to role and the number of shots he takes. Lately quite a few guys have not been shooting or playing well either, but he plays the most minutes, takes the most shots and thus takes the biggest blame or praise for success. Of course Kawhi has carried him and others through their slumps...
this stat is whole lot of spin.
So many people here talking about how everyone outside of Lee and Kawhi are net negatives have no idea how to read this stat. All it says is that Kawhi is playing out of his mind, Lee is playing really well (largely against bench units as Dedmon is in the SL) and the team has a net rating of 6.5 since Pau went down. That doesn't mean others have a net negative rating while on floor. Though with Aldridge the 15.0 is disconcerting.
Op![]()
Looking at net makes you dumb as
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)