Reply With Quote
What nothing from the bootlick crowd?
Don't tell me you all are going to ignore this conflict of interest.
Crooked Donny lets the bank he owes money to, Deutsche Bank, off the hook for laundering money for... guess who?
https://boingboing.net/2018/01/10/to...me-crime.html–The Trump Administration just published a small notice in the Federal Register announcing that it would waive the outstanding criminal sanctions against some of the world's largest banks, Citigroup, JPMorgan, Barclays, UBS and Deutsche Bank.
The banks were facing sanctions stemming from a variety of wrongdoing, including the trillions' worth of fraud in the LIBOR scandal, and Deutsche Bank's role in laundering $10B for Russian oligarchs.
What nothing from the bootlick crowd?
Don't tell me you all are going to ignore this conflict of interest.
Did they forgive his debt?
Trump Administration Waives Punishment For Convicted Banks, Including Deutsche — Which Trump Owes Millions
http://www.ibtimes.com/political-cap...mpression=true
Total corruption
Crony capitalism
Trash hiding his huge, criminal DB in the gang of miscreants
Don't think so. They aren't stupid, and know what kind of firestorm that would cause.
I wonder if the German Financial authorities will be HELPING Mueller get correct and complete INCRIMINATING Financial records out of DB
DB was one of the foreign banks bailed out by the US in the Banksters Great Depression, and has still been flirting with bankruptcy recently
So what does Donald get out of this
muh outrage
“In late 2016, the Obama administration extended temporary one-year waivers to five banks — Citigroup, JPMorgan, Barclays, UBS and Deutsche Bank. Late last month, the Trump administration issued new, longer waivers for those same banks, granting Citigroup, JPMorgan, and Barclays five-year exemptions. UBS and Deutsche Bank received three-year exemptions.”
Let me walk your stupid ass through Conflict of Interest 101.
Did Obama personally owe hundreds of millions of dollars to any of those banks?
Some sort of break on interest or payment terms. An unwarranted extension of further credit.
Easy to put in new funding that wouldn't have a chance, given his record, otherwise. Since he is president, every decision they make is suspect, even if it is innocuous.
The corrosive thing about potential conflicts of interest is that you can't know, and even if nothing goes on, the optics look bad, and tend to attract lawsuits. That is why GOOD business practices are to avoid even the appearance of such things by divestment.
OP is anti Semitic, we all know what you mean by letting “bankers” off the hook. Smh.
OP wants the leader to go after “bankers.” Hmm
"The Labor Department said Wednesday that Deutsche Bank got no special deal, and noted that the Obama administration had originally proposed a more valuable waiver lasting five years, instead of the three ultimately granted."
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireS...ction-52266588
My guess is the deal was that convicted money-launderer, distressed DB agreed to take $100Ms, $Bs, in deposits from Pootin with the understanding that it would be loaned to Trash.
The interest rate wasn't that important. DB had only to make a couple points on the laundered loan money to Trash above what DB was paying Pootin on the deposits.
What was important was that Pootin let Trash knows where the DB loan money was really coming from, hint, hint.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 01-13-2018 at 10:08 AM.
So, your argument is that the waivers aren't straight-up wrong?
(shrugs)
I'm sure that the Trump administration would *never* let one of Trumps business partners off the hook for something, or lie/excuse an action under a shield like that.
The problem with conflicts of interest is that you can never quite rule out some sort of favoritism. That is why they are so caustic, and why businesses avoid them if at all possible.
Not really an answer to my question, stupid mother er.Let me walk your stupid ass through Conflict of Interest 101.
Did Obama personally owe hundreds of millions of dollars to any of those banks?
Let me know if your dumb ass needs any of those short words explained.
Did Obama personally owe hundreds of millions of dollars to any of those banks?
Two posts on the same topic, you are working hard on this angle. Keep working on that hard on. We'll see what pops up.
You cannot even say if the waivers are wrong? I'll take that as a no and that your only point is that Trump has a conflict of interest. Well, I'm sure he's not the first president nor the last to have a conflict of interest if this is all we're talking about.
Conflicts of interest OK now.
And two Deutsche Bank lawyers were just appointed Deputy and US Attorney for the Southern District of New York....
this is from The Onion, right?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-u-s-attorneys
America is ed and un able. The oligarchy is no longer bothering to hide its corruption.
K, now that smells.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
