Reply With Quote
Good hire for them. Bud will do more with their talent than previous coaches which isn’t saying much.
...
Good hire for them. Bud will do more with their talent than previous coaches which isn’t saying much.
So Coach Bud, willing to trade any wing players to the Spurs?
Dark horse Leonard destination?
Good for bud
I'd take a deal with the Bucks anyday and have been saying so for two months.
Give me Parker, Middleton, and Henson along with your #17 pick.
I'd do that all day long and twice on Sunday.
Gross! No to Parker. No to Henson. 17th pick?
I would boycott SA if they did that.
The bucks suck with Giannis and those players; you think SA with NO Kawhi and them would fare well?
For Kawhi? Why?
Because...
1. I'm of the opinion he wants out unless he's offered the supermax...so sign him to a contract that hampers future cap flexibility, make a trade, or lose him for nothing.
2. I dont think you can offer that amount of money to him given his shenanigans this year. He earned his place as a risky investment.
3. And ongoing uncertainty over his quad condition. What ifs...?
4. Parker and Middleton were beasts on the board and quite efficient scorers--both potential starters.
5. Henson has some good upside and would certainly be a starter for us immediately at center (so three starters total)
6. Having two picks to work with given PATFO's ability to get great value would be something we haven't had in a loooong time.
7. Or a bundled 17th and 18th pick could potentially get you a top 10 pick if there's someone up in that range the Spurs coveted.
Good enough reason?
Gross? Evidently you haven't seen the people throw around on Twitter as options.
Three potential starters AND a mid round pick is a bad trade to you?
Btw, those three players are dogged. Exactly the kind of player that Pop likes. They certainly took it to us twice this year. I really dont get the disdain for this at all.
yesWant to join my fantasy basketball league though?
I'd take Middleton tbh, but the rest of that package is disgusting.
Who do we have at either Parker's position (seeing he could play 3, 4, or 5) or Henson's position (5) that are better?
Point is, only LMA is better than either one of those two. So you would be getting your 2nd and 3rd best players, another potential starter at center, and a mid first rounder.
Disgusting? Not by a loooong shot.
You telling me this is a worse lineup than what we trotted out last year?yes
Henson
Aldridge (Parker 2nd team or starter on Aldridge rest)
Middleton
Mills
Murray
Pau
Parker
Gay
Manu
Parker
???
That's a determined, athletic group.
I’m saying that I would rather Kawhi walk for nothing than get that package.
Wow. just wow.
Becky is ugly
Parker has looked as bad as our Parker since his 100th ACL tear, while Henson really doesn't have anymore potential (he's 27 and older than Kawhi) and isn't all that good to start with. LMA, Gasol (even washed up Gasoft), Manu, Gay, Green, Mills, and even Fathead are all better.
That’s awful! That’s roster filler, and a pick one better than ours.
Sure if you add those guys over Kawhi SA wins a few more games, but they aren’t good (Mid is fine) and if you are losing Kawhi you need a much better deal. Better picks or better younger talent or better older talent.
I'd be down for OF's package if we could also salary dump mills
I'm happy for Bud. Going to be a great fit imo
Already like the Bucks and Giannis. Now I can jump on the bandwagon
starters =/= roster filler
He's one year removed from 20/7. And he's only 23.
I'll take a 23 yo with that kind of potential under Pop's tutelage. BTW, he looked really good against us this year.
As for Henson, his is far more athletic than what we had. And if you listen to people talk about him, they think he has another level he has the ability to reach.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
