Adulterers good now. Media and twitter libs defnd Clinton Lewinsky non apology

[hater]

twitter lib trolls and media talking heads bending over backwards defending adulterer and accused rapist Bill Clinton

[hater]

Adultery good now:

[hater]

[Pavlov]

I only see tweets.

Where's all the media?

Also, you do know accused rapist Dennison is a verified serial adulterer, don't you?

[boutons_deux]

I only see tweets.

Where's all the media?

Also, you do know accused rapist Dennison is a verified serial adulterer, don't you?

... a so-called wealthy guy who started a model agency to have a stable, young pussies .

[hater]

[hater]

[Pavlov]

lol hater shook about being in World War III and total world peace at the same time-- has to start a distraction thread.

[hater]

[Pavlov]

The only media link you have is anti-Clinton.

hater

[Spurminator]

Yep, look at liberal media/Twitter just digging in their heels for Bill Clinton...

[hater]

Shaun King good now

[Winehole23]

u got pwned

[Spurminator]

Shaun King good now

Whether any of these people are good or not is irrelevant to the point you failed to make.

You need a real hobby.

[Pavlov]

hater got curbstomped by det liberal media.

[hater]

orchestrated by Trump

[hater]

Watch maddow for content

[Spurminator]

So on a thread you started accusing the liberal media of defending Bill Clinton, you posted a tweet of an MSNBC anchor criticizing Clinton just so you could include the reply of someone named Peg C with 117 followers.

This is going well for you.

[Pavlov]

hater mining those @duckonjunebug tweets

[spurraider21]

So on a thread you started accusing the liberal media of defending Bill Clinton, you posted a tweet of an MSNBC anchor criticizing Clinton just so you could include the reply of someone named Peg C with 117 followers.

This is going well for you.

[hater]

[Pavlov]

hater seriously researching tweets by @ Cats4mice

[hater]

So on a thread you started accusing the liberal media of defending Bill Clinton, you posted a tweet of an MSNBC anchor criticizing Clinton just so you could include the reply of someone named Peg C with 117 followers.

This is going well for you.

Read the entire thread le and adjust your post accordingly brah

[DisAsTerBot]

So on a thread you started accusing the liberal media of defending Bill Clinton, you posted a tweet of an MSNBC anchor criticizing Clinton just so you could include the reply of someone named Peg C with 117 followers.

This is going well for you.

[Spurminator]

Read the entire thread le and adjust your post accordingly brah

I'm not denying there are random nobodies and bots on Twitter defending Bill Clinton. But any objective review of liberal media and verified Twitter accounts would show very little support for his comments. So your headline is wrong unless you expected people to interpret it to mean you found some random egg accounts defending Bill Clinton and wanted everyone to know about it.... which is fine I guess, but kind of stupid.