Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    660
    They were up by 10 but the Bucks made a 7 point swing because hey Dont forget about Aldridge touches..Meanwhile, Derozan, and practically everyone else beside Aldridge were having good games.

  2. #2
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    OP with the troof nukes

  3. #3
    Veteran JeffDuncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    3,045
    Aldridge was 6 for 12. Complaining about that is nothing but brain-dead -head stupid.

  4. #4
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    660
    Aldridge was 6 for 12. Complaining about that is nothing but brain-dead -head stupid.
    Spoken like a true casual.

    FG isnt = touches. You can be the focal of a set and not end up shooting.

  5. #5
    Veteran SpursDynasty85's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    2,890
    Spoken like a true casual.

    FG isnt = touches. You can be the focal of a set and not end up shooting.
    He was all NBA just last year. Offense has been restructured. He is missing bunnies at this point and if we can't rely on Aldridge and need to rely on Mill, Forbes, Gay then we are definitely a low lottery team. If Aldridge just hits these bunnies we should be 4 games up from here and squarely contending with the pack. We are honestly relying too much on DeRozan at this point.

  6. #6
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    12,596
    They were up by 10 but the Bucks made a 7 point swing because hey Dont forget about Aldridge touches..Meanwhile, Derozan, and practically everyone else beside Aldridge were having good games.

    Actually putting Gay on the bench - when they were up 10 - is why they lost.

    Aldridge is still the best 1st or 2nd option on this team - Derozan and Aldridge can at times be the first option and are interchangeable as 1st options.
    Gay is another option but unfortunately his body limits him and his health/foot issues are causes for concern.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,195
    We will continue to loose because our bench is terrible the worse then I can ever remember.

  8. #8
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    3 rebounds and disgusting rim protection. LaTouches is a black hole when he doesn't lead the team in FGA's. It's gotten worse than when Kawhi was here. Dude isn't even hiding the fact that he's not trying.

  9. #9
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    When LMA's extension kicks in, posters will remember the Pau & Patty contracts with fondness.

  10. #10
    Believe. alpha_HaZE's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    838
    The only thing that comes to mind is they want him to play well so they can trade him.

  11. #11
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    He was all NBA just last year. Offense has been restructured. He is missing bunnies at this point and if we can't rely on Aldridge and need to rely on Mill, Forbes, Gay then we are definitely a low lottery team. If Aldridge just hits these bunnies we should be 4 games up from here and squarely contending with the pack. We are honestly relying too much on DeRozan at this point.
    lot of ifs

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •