Reply With Quote
If it was harris and two #1's the spurs should have seriously considered but who knows!?
But the Spurs didn’t want to send nephew home because of their pride and went for the worse package from the Raptors
If it was harris and two #1's the spurs should have seriously considered but who knows!?
I bet that was never on the table because if it was then i agree
Could certainly consider it if you'd known the guards were going to look so good. Still wouldn't have been that great unless the team could have turned those picks into more than prospects. Three guys drafted between 12-18 would have made for an awkward roster. Had they been able to work a deal for Kemba and held onto Green, that would have been interesting
Kemba, Murray
Green, White
Gay
Harris, Bertans
Aldridge, Gasol
While also having a pretty decent cap position. Maybe Gay doesn't re-up if DeRozan isn't part of the deal. Oh well. I really do like the team as is. DeMar just needs to get his head on straight.
I kept saying Kawhi for Harris/Harrell S&T/12/13 and was continually told it was an awful return.
LOL.
Poetl will forever be the worst part of the deal with the Raptors.
Yeah, but you should have seen all the girls scouts in the forum that wanted DeRozen, not to mention Timvp's post about DDR's dynamic offensive ability and HH37 calling him a star.
DeRozan on the season has a team leading on-off of -11.1 so it shouldn't even come as a surprise that he was a team leading -14 vs the Clippers.
Trade both picks and whoever for Harris and Motley. Drunkford's ego couldn't send Kawhi to LA even if the better deal was there
We don’t even know if that offer was ever on the table.
Also, like the Lakers, the Clippers never would have made that trade because they were dealing from a position of strength.
Oh geez, here we go...
Give me a break. Dude is in a slump.
How many times are you going to say that and act like it was possible? You apparently remember being slighted, so I find it hard to believe you've forgotten the objective problems with the deal.
Yes, the Spurs never showed their hand with who they wanted drafted.
Anyways, awful game. At least the defense looked better in the 2nd half, tbh.
Don't care TBH Harris and Harrell are not game changers.
Firstly, to see how low the comparison is, you are comparing one of the worst DD runs in recent years to Harris best career run. Despite that, DD stats over the course of the season is ever so slightly better, to go along with some clutch shots this season. Over the 3 games they have played each other, they are pretty close.
DD 22ppg 8.3reb 4.6ast 2.6stl 1blk 2.6to 41% 0% 86%
TH 20.3ppg 8reb 5.6ast 1.3stl .6blk 1.6to 52% 41% 66%
Harris is a free agent and DD is locked up for another season. There is no comparison, Spurs did the right choice getting Tor package over LAC.
Easily. Would have a better team now:
White/Mills or Alexander
Green/Belinelli
Gay/Bridges or Forbes
Harris/Bertans
Aldridge/Gasol or Harrel
And all those promising pieces for the future: Alexander, Harris, White, Murray, Walker, Bridges, Bertans, Harrel, Forbes, Metu.
It would have been the mother of all rebuilds while still competing.
Go back to watching the Teletubbies tbh.
With the goods per par
Clippers were fallback plan if the deal with/Toronto wouldn't have gone through.
Thought you had something smart to say for once, obviously I was wrong. Back to ignore you go.
Remove Harrell because it would be impossible. Essentially your swapping Alexander, Bridges and Green for Poeltl here, and Spurs are yet to use raptors pick and could also lose Harris (or over pay him greatly).
By the off season it could be Alexander, bridges for Leonard. Bravo, what a future.
You were also continuously told of it's impossibility. I believe it was Chinook who broke it down for you bruh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
