No and No

[a777pilot]

1. Is the Attorney General required by law to release all or any of the Muller report?

Answer: No!

2. The Attorney General has provided to members of the Senate and the House a procedure where by any member of the House or Senate can come a read the entire, un-redacted, Muller report. Has any Democrat availed themselves of this opportunity to read the entire report?

Answer: No!

[Th'Pusher]

1. Is the Attorney General required by law to release all or any of the Muller report?

Answer: No!

2. The Attorney General has provided to members of the Senate and the House a procedure where by any member of the House or Senate can come a read the entire, un-redacted, Muller report. Has any Democrat availed themselves of this opportunity to read the entire report?

Answer: No!

I hadn’t read anything about your send point. Specifically about the report being available to any member of Congress. Can you provide a link?

[a777pilot]

I hadn’t red anything about your send point. Specifically about the report being available to any member of Congress. Can you provide a link?

Yes, I could but why should I?

Can you research it yourself? I am not your administrative assistant.

[Th'Pusher]

Yes, I could but why should I?

Can you research it yourself? I am not your administrative assistant.

I searched for it and couldn’t find anything. I’m going to assume you’re lying until you can back up your claim.

[a777pilot]

I searched for it and couldn’t find anything. I’m going to assume you’re lying until you can back up your claim.

Assume away.

[Pavlov]

Yes, I could but why should I?

Because I call bull .

[a777pilot]

Because I call bull .

Then I call bull on your bull .

[baseline bum]

Does every ing thought of yours deserve a new thread, Hobart?

[Pavlov]

Then I call bull on your bull .

Yesterday, the U.S. Justice Department rebuffed a House Judiciary Committee request for a complete copy of the special counsel’s report together with related investigative records.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...eduling-issues

That was easy.

[boutons_deux]

Does every ing thought of yours deserve a new thread, Hobart?

777's thread-starting hubris on a level with duck's.

Neither's threads merit engagement, or even reading.

777 is either an excellent troll, or a total ing ignorant, gullible check-box dupe for Repug/Fox/rightwing hate media propaganda and lies.

[a777pilot]

This is interesting:

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/...lame-ken-starr


My course for the AG allowing the Members of Congress to read the entire Muller report was a guess on FOX. Turns out he was wrong, i.e., not totally right. Even the AG does not have the power nor authority to make the entire report available un-redacted. There are areas, such as national security, Grand Jury testimony and others by law, the cannot be made available.

I was not correct, but close.

It turns out that none of the Democrat Members have availed themselves of even this lightly redacted version.

As is most things in Washington, D.C., it's all politics.

[Pavlov]

This is interesting:

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/...lame-ken-starr


My course for the AG allowing the Members of Congress to read the entire Muller report was a guess on FOX. Turns out he was wrong, i.e., not totally right. Even the AG does not have the power nor authority to make the entire report available un-redacted. There are areas, such as national security, Grand Jury testimony and others by law, the cannot be made available.

I was not correct, but close.

It turns out that none of the Democrat Members have availed themselves of even this lightly redacted version.

As is most things in Washington, D.C., it's all politics.

No, you were wrong.

Period.

You made a bull claim. I called you out on it. Turns out your bull claim was bull just as I said.

[a777pilot]

No, you were wrong.

Period.

You made a bull claim. I called you out on it. Turns out your bull claim was bull just as I said.

Think it through. You can do it. Try. I have faith in you.

A guess on FOX said that the AG had made available to all members of Congress a totally un-redacted copy of the Muller report and that none had read it. I didn't make this up. I just retold it here. I did my own research and found out, thanks to Clinton and Reno, the AG does not have that authority.

Was I wrong? Debatable. I just reported what was said, but unlike the MSM I did further study and found the truth. Y'all ought try that too.

There is, however, a "tightly" redacted version of the Muller report that IS available to the Members of the house and Senate.

[Pavlov]

Think it through. You can do it. Try. I have faith in you.

The Attorney General has provided to members of the Senate and the House a procedure where by any member of the House or Senate can come a read the entire, un-redacted, Muller report.

That was bull .

I told you it was bull .

I proved it was bull .

You agreed it was bull .

[a777pilot]

That was bull . It was accurately reported.

I told you it was bull . Yes, you did, but you could not explain why.

I proved it was bull . NO, YOU DID NOT! You just stated it was BS. no proof was given.

You agreed it was bull . I did no such thing. I did my research and found an error in the guest's statement and made the necessary correction.

I opine this is why few if any take you seriously.

[a777pilot]

If you take a test and one of your answers is wrong, does the teacher have you stand before the class and yell at you for being a liar?

[Pavlov]

I opine this is why few if any take you seriously.

Who "reported" this?

I know you're trying to cover up your lie.

I proved it was bull by showing there is no access to the unredacted report with a link to the source of the information.

I did my research after you proved it was bull .

[Pavlov]

If you take a test and one of your answers is wrong, does the teacher have you stand before the class and yell at you for being a liar?

You made a claim.

That claim was a lie.

[Trainwreck2100]

Think it through. You can do it. Try. I have faith in you.

A guess on FOX said that the AG had made available to all members of Congress a totally un-redacted copy of the Muller report and that none had read it. I didn't make this up. I just retold it here. I did my own research and found out, thanks to Clinton and Reno, the AG does not have that authority.

Was I wrong? Debatable. I just reported what was said, but unlike the MSM I did further study and found the truth. Y'all ought try that too.

There is, however, a "tightly" redacted version of the Muller report that IS available to the Members of the house and Senate.

repeating a lie is still a lie, it also means you're a gullible idiot.

[a777pilot]

I repeated what was said. What was said turned out to be in error. Neither the original statement nor my repeating of it was a lie.

[Trainwreck2100]

It was not the truth and by definition a lie. I dont know what country you come from but while you are here please learn english

[Pavlov]

I repeated what was said.

Said by whom?

Who started this lie you spread?

[a777pilot]

Mike Tennant

[Pavlov]

Mike Tennant

Google says nothing about such a guy.

[DarrinS]

Barr gave them a less redacted version, but only two Republicans bothered to review it.