Reply With Quote
As much as we complain, it really sucks to be some of those other teams.
Blake had an amazing year, and now he’s hurt and getting $40+ per year with zero help around him.
As much as we complain, it really sucks to be some of those other teams.
Blake had an amazing year, and now he’s hurt and getting $40+ per year with zero help around him.
There's a thread for trade discussions in the Think Tank forum you dumb .
Their existing PG is already much better
This is spurs related
They need a point guard and can not get a star
Need to extend team leader Patty... 3 years/$60m should cover a lot of coffee parties, IMO
I'll root for Patty where ever he is or where ever he goes. But I honestly think Spurs will be better off if he leaves. He's no good to us if he's not going to shoot 40 3FG.
Mills contract is probably too expensive for them. But they might be interested in Forbes. Their 15th pick is intriguing
I don't see any interest in Mills there. Nobody wants the Spurs worst palyers.
Mills and Beli have to go
I know you’re joking on 15 for Forbes, but we’ve turned George Hill right before his free agency into something similar. Unfortunately teams aren’t as dumb anymore.
Most people around here would prefer dumping Mills over Forbes. But if it’s going to mean giving up value to get rid of Mills, and getting value for Forbes, then Forbes is the one to move. They're redundant and Patty is only 14 months from becoming an expiring contract (basically after July 2020 free agency, he’ll be much easier to trade).
I'm not saying 15 for Fobes. I'm saying Forbes and the 19th pick for Pistons 15th. That is a possibility, it's just a matter of who the teams target
I think Mills makes sense for a lot of teams, even at his price. It’s not just the Spurs that value his leadership/shooting. Spurs probably value it MORE than other teams, but teams like DET and even PHX that need guard depth and leadership have to be looking at players like this.
Do I think SA could net a real asset? Probably not, but if they can not have to pay to trade Mills, that alone (cap space, clearing log jam) may be enough reason.
Mills reminds me of bad Bonner, when he was playing higher in the rotation than his skillset would dictate. With Murray healthy and Walker hopefully being good enough to warrant minutes with the big squad, Mills should be a fringe rotation player. He might even get the treatment that Parker was going to get from Pop, had Parker stayed around.
Mills shot 11% from 3 against the nuggets. He's untradeable because he sucks so bad and he's pop's pet.
I agree; but I am saying there will be teams that are interested in Mills. Money aside, he will be valued by certain teams for certain reasons. And I find it hard to believe Pop/RC would be ok with paying someone 12/13M to not play...Mills would never complain about that role, but like TP I am sure he want to play.
I havent check the stats but is this true?
Wow
At least Raptors Coach Bench their own midget in game 4. Pop would have never done that
I dont think teams that value Mills would be too scared of that. Its not great obviously, but Mills is a regular season minutes soaker that can play PG in a pinch and provide some 3PT shooting (shot just under 40% for the season). I dont think anyone would expect Mills to be some playoff savior.
Pop lacks common sense.I havent check the stats but is this true?
Wow
At least Raptors Coach Bench their own midget in game 4. Pop would have never done that
God himself cant rid of of this useless wombat cuck
Pop's team lacks talent, Mills had to play
Pop will never bench Mills. He plays him to justify the contract, same with Pau. The only hope is Patty gets injured and somebody takes his spot. And I don't see that happen since Mills has missed like 4 games in 3 years
He fits well in philly or with the Lakers.
11%? Jesus
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
