Reply With Quote
why would they do that?
why would they do that?
Actually the linked articles (thanks for sharing) says Trump begged Iraq troops to protect the embassy...
So he showed concern for their safety in the face of imminent danger. Refreshing.
I haven’t seen a President in my lifetime that hasn’t. But yes, it’s actually good to see he’s not that shallow.
I guess you didn't see Benghazi. Yes, your hero is that shallow.
I did see Benghazi. The problem is that you were more interested with the whole Shillary story to really care about the ambassador or anybody else for that matter. Much to your chagrin I’m no fan of Obama, and I actually pointed out back then that the whole YouTube thing was baloney, but hey, you do your OCD thing.
Yea, I'm the one who didn't care.
You really haven't connected the dots yet? This isn't a right wing smear. I'll tell you all day long that the Republicans aren't but a hair better than Democrats if they're better at all. But the general truth of what happened has been revealed.
I couldn’t care less about team red or blue. I simply don’t have the slightest idea what conspiracy theory you’re going on about. So please do tell.
I merely pointed out that the president didn’t actually sent troops. He expects the Iraqi army to protect the embassy, at least for the time being. Not sure how that triggered Obama or anything like it.
I don't believe that. But I put the fine point on it that one can easily see the reality regardless of teams.
It's no conspiracy theory. The evidence is all there that there was gross negligence / corruption. It all came out in the hearings / wikileaks.
You're just being your willfully ignorant self on behalf of Team Blue.
I just don’t really care how you feel about me either. All I can say is I never cast a vote for team blue, so I must be a terrible team player, tbh.
I agree that there was certain amount of negligence. I would also agree that incident better prepared to handle situations like what happened now.
What does that has anything to do with what I wrote?
Standard play. Nobody said it's about how I feel.
You parrot the nothing to see here line. You're partisan hack AF.
You just literally opined what my political leanings are. Maybe if you stop making posts about people (see this post I quoted, where you completely left out the substance and went for the personal), and engage on the topic at hand you’ll be taken seriously.
I know who I am, thanks.
There are always lessons to be learned; but the idea that we weren't prepared much more than the lack of response that occurred is preposterous.
The Americans on the ground were outright betrayed by their government during the conflict and in the aftermath. It's sickening.
I don't care if a sperm shielder takes me seriously, tbh.
I know who you are, you're welcome.
Not what happened according to the Congressional investigation. Negligence? Yes. On purpose? No.
Sorry, they actually conducted an investigation, you didn’t.
Everybody knows who I am. It’s not like I just showed up.
The difference with you is that I don’t care about the e-persona like you do.
This is not a Warning, it is a Threat. Happy New Year!
Difference in tactics, sure. But that's not an argument for or against anything except that matter in a vacuum.
It really makes no difference on your level of sperm shielding.
lol @ tactics. Seek professional help.
Everyone on here has their tactics.
Blake cucks.
Dump humps.
Snitch Factor snitches.
Lite philos.
Tranny manstrates.
I could go on, but you get the point.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
