Reply With Quote
That's called insurance being wads and like i said the last time this was posted, that should be the real story.
That's called insurance being wads and like i said the last time this was posted, that should be the real story.
so you know who gave it to them?
Whatever that means. They were constantly lying by omission. And some big stories were even faked outright.
Sure there's been a rhetorical shift though.
You think the NYT obtained Trump’s taxes with authorization?
some of you lately are really outing yourselves as ing re s.
The shop owner was the legal owner of the laptop after it was not picked up in the required number of days.
On the contrary, the MSM covered the violence extensively. Peaceful protests get very few clicks.
Hence your availability bias and everyone else's, totally out of joint with a much broader, notably peaceful political movement.
Dabom never received an admittance letter from the Chumpettes.
"They need to be regulated now. They need to be made into a public utility, now. Facebook and google account for 70% of all the news people read in the United states. That's dangerous, that's unhealthy for a democracy."
Props to Will Hunting for at least being honest and instead of semen shielding the blatant political censorship meant to help Biden he instead cheers it on. The rest of you are ing dishonest pussies.
If you recall the Clinton impeachment, most of them turned on their darling Bill in the midst of all that.
You think Hillary was running an indoor sex cabal at a chuck e cheese. Just giving you what you been putting out there.You think the NYT obtained Trump’s taxes with authorization?
So you can't say it was without authorization, but okay has Trump ever acknowledged they were actually his? I don't think he has? So are they violating the ill gotten information clause if they aren't his taxes, which he hasn't acknowledged so therefore not against that particular TOS because he hasn't said they are his. He's alluded to them not being his. "I pay lot's of taxes" (paraphrasing)
Facts don't care about your feelings. 93% fits the requirements to say "most." By a long shot.
You reap what you sow, got.
By the way, of a productive day for you. Did you leave your computer at all?
Trump PR
I’d be in favor of that but seriously, conservatives now want to nationalize private self sufficient companies?
hey you guys aren't being cool even though the last five year I've been an absolute tool seth rich, pizza, obamagate, don't act the same way I did because that's mean
What are you going on about? This story is a rehash. It doesn’t help or hurt Biden, the guy actually running for president.
Stop flailing.
Recall The Persian Gulf War. Those guided missile videos were faked. CNN knowingly played them anyways.
VALIANTLY defending his cult leaders honor!
hahahahahahahahaha!
Nah, no one is required to run unsubstantiated partisan propaganda.
1st Amendment still applies to private companies.
Until it's your shop, or your friends or family's shop...that you have worked your whole life for and pumped all your savings into it. Then it because less than peaceful.
Even 7% is too high.
Of course it hurts Sleepy Joe. He was supposedly maintaining a thin veneer of deniability. That's been shredded.
People weren't voting for death and destruction anyways; but whatever holdouts won't be voting for corruption either.
Btw, something the wannabe justice doesn’t even know.
ing failed so hard on this layup.
I don't think cheering on censorship is exactly an honest position, tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Rudy
