it was silly to block it
it was silly to block it
@Twitter Jack this is not nearly good enough. In fact, it’s a joke. It’s downright insulting. I will ask you - and @Facebook - to give an explanation UNDER OATH to the Senate subcommittee I chair. These are potential violations of election law, and that’s a crime
Which subcommittee do you chair, Senator ducks?
Don’t post personal information such as pictures, phones and email addresses and you will be fine.
This story would have conveyed its intended message without the Hunter pictures on it. It was done to humiliate him.
Pics of trump to humiliate him left on both
I hear ya. I’ve been schooling people about the dangers of your picture on the internet, for all to see.
Any pic of Dump would humiliate him. Hes a human pig
This is the equivalent of "I'm sorry if you were offended.""Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great," he tweeted. "And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable."
The censorship continues strongly as ever.
If Biden's side provided such crap to media and it hurt Trash, would Repugs attack the media, anti-section 230, claiming the media is liable publishing content that is crap?
Yet now its unblocked![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)