Reply With Quote
I pity that rube. He's gonna lose his job because he believed Trump's fake news.
USPS ‘Whistleblower’ Told Agents Project Veritas Penned His Ballot-Tampering Claim
https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...b8e_story.htmlThe two-hour recording shows that Richard Hopkins recanted claims he had made in a sworn affidavit that top Republicans cited over the weekend as potential evidence of widespread election irregularities and fraud.
Hopkins told federal investigators on Monday his allegations were based on fragments of conversation among co-workers in a noisy mail facility in Erie, Pa., according to the recording.
When an agent from the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General asked Hopkins if he stood by his sworn statement that a supervisor “was backdating ballots” mailed after Election Day, Hopkins answered: “At this point? No.”
He also agreed to sign a revised statement that undercut his earlier affidavit.
Hopkins also repeatedly expressed regret for signing the initial affidavit because it overstated what he knew and witnessed, according to the recording.
He told agents the affidavit was written by Project Veritas.
He said he was not fully aware of its contents because he was in “so much shock I wasn’t paying that much attention to what they were telling me.”
I pity that rube. He's gonna lose his job because he believed Trump's fake news.
he never heard them mentioning backdating. he said he heard about some ballots marked for the 4th, one for the 3rd, and he filled in all the gaps and ran to veritas
Long thread on the interview and worth the read. Start from the beginning if you want an educated synopsis of the interview and not the WaPo bull RandomGuy linked.he never heard them mentioning backdating. he said he heard about some ballots marked for the 4th, one for the 3rd, and he filled in all the gaps and ran to veritas
i watched the full 2 hour vid tbh, i dont need to read somebody else's summary
he heard something he thought was su ious (being a trump supporter i have no doubt he already had some preconceived notions), and he filled in a lot of gaps himself and made assumptions
Random twitter thread = educated synopsis
Dude trashed his affidavit and got a new one to sign.
That is definitely a recantation.
Shame on
Random twitter thread = educated synopsis
Leslie McAdoo
Lawyer - security clearances, debarment, gov’t employee discipline, criminal/OIG investigations trials & appeals; expert (clearance law) in federal court & DoD
then he goes back to veritas and says nuh uh btw here's my new gofundme thing
yes, some lawyer on twitter.
Leslie McAdoo
Lawyer - security clearances, debarment, gov’t employee discipline, criminal/OIG investigations trials & appeals; expert (clearance law) in federal court & DoD
Then you'd agree WaPo completely mischaracterized the interview.
Leslie McAdoo
Lawyer - security clearances, debarment, gov’t employee discipline, criminal/OIG investigations trials & appeals; expert (clearance law) in federal court & DoD
He's gonna need the money.
i havent read the WaPo article
says the green lawyer on spurstalk
https://www.mcadoolaw.com/
says the avocado salesman on spurstalksays the green lawyer on spurstalk
"educated synopsis"
every educated person thought pizzagate was plausible!
Leslie McAdoo Gordon is a 1996 laude graduate of the Georgetown University Law Center.
She is admitted to practice law in:
Maryland, the District of Columbia, & Virginia,
the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia,
the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland,
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia,
the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and
the United States Supreme Court.
Ms. McAdoo Gordon practices before all the federal agencies in security clearance, debarment, & employee discipline cases.
Prior to becoming an attorney, Ms. McAdoo Gordon was a Special Agent at the Department of Defense, conducting background investigations for security clearance.
Ms. McAdoo Gordon has taught numerous courses about security clearances and expungment law to various bar associations & groups and has testified as a expert in security clearances.
Ms. McAdoo Gordon was recognized as a Top Lawyer in National Security Law by Washingtonian magazine, December 2015 Edition.
yes and if i tweeted a thread full of my opinions, i wouldnt expect people to share it around the internet calling it an educated synopsissays the green lawyer on spurstalk
This message is hidden because ChumpDumper is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
I.Leslie McAdoo Gordon is a 1996 laude graduate of the Georgetown University Law Center.
She is admitted to practice law in:
Maryland, the District of Columbia, & Virginia,
the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia,
the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland,
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia,
the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and
the United States Supreme Court.
Ms. McAdoo Gordon practices before all the federal agencies in security clearance, debarment, & employee discipline cases.
Prior to becoming an attorney, Ms. McAdoo Gordon was a Special Agent at the Department of Defense, conducting background investigations for security clearance.
Ms. McAdoo Gordon has taught numerous courses about security clearances and expungment law to various bar associations & groups and has testified as a expert in security clearances.
Ms. McAdoo Gordon was recognized as a Top Lawyer in National Security Law by Washingtonian magazine, December 2015 Edition.
Don't.
Care.
its not very difficult to be admitted to practice in federal district courts
if i paid some money i could be admitted to all sorts of district courts in CA and VA
and you dont even need to take the DC bar to practice there, just be admitted to any other state for 5 years, be in good standing, and pay them some money for an application fee
i'd also generally be skeptical of people who make "best lawyers of x" awards... i get solicitation emails asking me to pay them money to get on such lists all the time
just read it. what part of the WaPo article do you find to be a mischaracterization? i thought it was pretty fair.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
