Maximum was 10. Had to make the decision of leaving out some prospects. The assumption here is if ANY of the listed prospects are there at 4, who would you pick?
After this poll gets enough votes, I’ll make the next thread with the same set of prospects minus the one who gets the most votes in this thread, and so forth…
Maximum was 10. Had to make the decision of leaving out some prospects. The assumption here is if ANY of the listed prospects are there at 4, who would you pick?
It’s a tough decision but for the spurs I think Risacher fits the mold of what we need the most.
Can't really say I have ONE favorite prospect... want some combination of upside and fit, shooting, playmaking and defense, and balancing the roster. To meet those, I'd go with Risacher or Castle at 4 (whomever is there because at most one will be available, if both are gone then Buzelis), then Dillingham at 4 with Sheppard as an alternative. Not really sold on anyone in particular as clearly above the rest, but would rather avoid unskilled, long term projects like Salaun who may take years of investment before even knowing if he's a keeper or not (we already have plenty of those).
Save your case when scenarios for the subsequent threads. Commit to one. Vote.
Buzelis Sickos Club, checking in
Risacher offers the less risks
Until the Spurs sniff the playoffs I want to draft upside and that’s definitely Buzelis
Luka Samanic 2.0 tbh.
i dont think samanic was an awful prospect. good physical profile, solid skills to work off of. should have been picked later than he was, but oh well. think a lot of his shortcomings are due to his at ude and the mental side of things.
Going to be painful when Salaun is the 4th pick tbh
Castle
Castle is my favorite but Risacher is probably my #1 if you can get him easily.
Voted Castle because he's my personal subjective favorite, he's the best most realistically available pick at #4, and I just buy his upside when I watch his clips. Watched his whole tourney and a few reg season UCONN games and his feel for the game is insane. I also suspect UCONN team system subdued a lot of Castle's individual brilliance in the name of team just based on what he's doing in his HS tapes. I do worry about his shot coming around though.
Maybe the Finals were too recent but I see Castle as a Jrue Holiday type which would be nice on the Spurs team.
Feels like behind Vassell the guard situation is more barren than it appears. Jones may be rolling off after the year and wary of counting on Branham and co to turn that corner which is possible but I'd rather stuff some depth there and feel like Castle is an intuitive player enough that he will contribute in small ways even right away. Lots of those 2/2/8 games where he was everywhere and doing a lot of little support things that feel beneficial to the team but maybe not popping the box score so much.
Chose Sheppard for the shot, feel and defensive production. Would be happy with Castle, Risacher or Sarr at #4 as well.
i voted risacher but i have each of Risacher, Sheppard, and Dillingham in my top tier. the reason i'd say i prefer Risacher is because there is no world where we can take him at 8, but we can probably get Dilly at 8
So you’re basing this on player not draft position? IE there is almost no chance that Sarr is there at 4 but he may very well be the spurs number 1 prospect.
Do I select based on our pick position or select as if we had the 1st pick and that is my number one on my big board.
Purely personal board. Don’t choose who you think the Spurs have as their number 1. Pick the guy you want most.
I would rather draft a bust than a role player at this point in time.
Don’t draft scared
So you would draft Sheppard first if you had the first pick?
He's soft, no shot creation, going to the basket is weak
1. Buzelis
2. Sarr
3. Cody Williams
4. Salaun
5. Risacher
6. Dillingham
7. Castle
8. Sheppard
9. Devin Carter
10. Tristan Da Silva
11. Topic
12 Knecht
these are the 12 I would be happy with the spurs drafting in order
Wrex.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)