[2024 Draft Consensus Series] Who is SpursTalk’s #4 Prospect?

[Dejounte]

1. Risacher
2. Castle
3. Sheppard
4. ???

[spurraider21]

It’s between Sarr and Dilly imo but went with Sarr

[Ariel]

This is where it's tough for me to answer. Spurs don't have 1 pick but 2, and picking option D for pick #4 is different from picking option A for pick #8. Also, whomever was taken the first time should be taken into account when picking for the second time. So it feels like too reductionist an approach and I'm going to pass this time.

[Dejounte]

This is where it's tough for me to answer. Spurs don't have 1 pick but 2, and picking option D for pick #4 is different from picking option A for pick #8. Also, whomever was taken the first time should be taken into account when picking for the second time. So it feels like too reductionist an approach and I'm going to pass this time.

You’re playing this game with the rest of the board. It’s a popularity contest, and that’s it. Everybody’s preferred presidential candidate doesn’t make it into the final two either, but they make their vote count by voting for (sometimes against) a candidate that matches closest to their principles. You’re free to do what you want, but not voting especially when there are no stakes involved (also purely anonymous) is no fun.

[Pauleta14]

It’s between Sarr and Dilly imo but went with Sarr

If either isn't taken with 1st or 2nd pick they shouldn't be taken

Both have the highest ceilings but also the highest busts probabilities

Either you bet on them as 1st pick if you really believe in either or you pass and choose and longer shot (imho)

[Ariel]

You’re playing this game with the rest of the board. It’s a popularity contest, and that’s it. Everybody’s preferred presidential candidate doesn’t make it into the final two either, but they make their vote count by voting for (sometimes against) a candidate that matches closest to their principles. You’re free to do what you want, but not voting especially when there are no stakes involved (also purely anonymous) is no fun.

I'm not scared about being wrong, I haven't been shy about stating my preferences and I assume they won't look all that good in hindsight. It's that it's honestly difficult for me to come up with a sensible answer, which would be easier if the Spurs had just one pick. But not to be a party pooper, I'll say Sarr even if I don't consider that option to be of any practical significance, really.
EDIT: forgot Buzelis was available, went with him.

[Dejounte]

Last call!

[scott]

Vote #4 for Buzelis. I'll just keep voting over and over for my preferred candidate, just like a real election.