I know you really don't engage on the forum anymore, but how does Mitch get B-?
You also wrote this:
How did it make sense? We went down early only because of that dumb starting lineup with no size.The rotation made sense to me throughout the game.
Then he played lineups with just Castle on the floor.
Bringing CP3 back late on only to have Bridges attack him right away wasn't a basketball decision.
CP3 obviously knew he shouldn't be on the floor while Castle has it going and they were killing us on the boards, but his ego didn't let him sit this one out and Mitch has no authority to bench him.
And the game was lost because of it.
His leadership and mentorship is obviously a positive, but with Fox on the team what's left of his basketball ability isn't needed unless it's a bench role and with him and Fox being mutually exclusive in the lineups.
We brought Fox to fix our offense, but he'll spend the rest of the season chasing opposition's best guards around because CP3 has to be hidden in the corner.
He wasn't even initiating sets or bringing the ball up most of the time.
Keldon playing 16 minutes with a Tony Snell statline is also a negative for Mitch's grade.
As is Champagnie getting just 2 3pta in 19 minutes.
We're just playing random offense with no structure.
Can't get any easy looks for Wemby, can't get any shots for our shooter.
If he persists with this lineup, it's going to be a slaughter in Orlando and Boston, they have big size advantage on all perimeter positions.

Reply With Quote
).
