Reply With Quote
unfortunately, that first game was most likely the only game I got to go to all season.
. . . lose the first game of the back-to-back.
unfortunately, that first game was most likely the only game I got to go to all season.
Play the Knicks 82 times.
nice! haha!!!
that makes absolutely no sense. You still end up w/ only one win. I know you're kidding but still.
Damn! And here I thought I made a major step closer to getting a head coaching job. Oh, well, back to the drawing board . . .
^^ lol
I don't know, Shoog. I think you're really on to something here. It's truly thinking outside of the box.
Where the was this post? I need to have it framed.
I have a friend who is always coming up with whack rule changes. His best one was that teams should play the overtime period first. That way at end of a close game in regulation you'd have one time trying desperately to avoid a tie, because they already knew they'd lost the OT.
Solution : how about lose all the back-to-back games , and win all the other games including in playoff (since playoff no back-to-back)
when Rasho is on the bench or in another uni, and Manu is healthy?
the back to back loss problem will be moot.
Or have only the second string players play on the first night.
the second night come out full strength.
we lost a few of those back to backs with manu, and rasho isn't the reason we lost the second game of back to backs. teams lose games, not centers and shooting guards. rasho is obviously our best option at center. in the spurs system you play d or ride the pine...
Where the was this post? I need to have it framed.
I have a friend who is always coming up with whack rule changes. His best one was that teams should play the overtime period first. That way at end of a close game in regulation you'd have one time trying desperately to avoid a tie, because they already knew they'd lost the OT.
good rule change that would kill the spurs or make them shoot ft's better: make ft's one and one.
I think tonight they had their heads into the game. I don't like how the lead almost twindled into sigle digits. Beno, Rasho, and Fabricio need to be traded or their a** need to get in gear and get with the program.
you forgot nazr.
Why not try to win both games?
Whoa. Dude!
Nah. I liket the OT first rule better - it's more logical.
"Why not try to win both games?"
because now isn't after mid-April. The season, and the fans, don't count.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
