Wanna bet?
Ain't it GREAT?
and if/when the dems Lose again? oh man. what a day that will be.![]()
Wanna bet?
who you got?
Hillary?
I told you nobody can beat Guliani/Rice.
No, I mean W won't last 3 more years. I expect Cheney to take a siesta sometime next year. His excuse will be health reasons, but really Fizgerald will, by then, be breathing down his spiny neck. Whomever gets the nod to replace Cheney will be the likely candidate for the Republicans in 08.
interesting theories dan.
i doubt cheney is going anywhere, but i'd be all for Condi as VP.![]()
Condi would be a likely choice, but I wouldn't rule out Giuliani.
MSNBC poll: Do you believe President Bush's actions justify impeachment?
Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial.
88%
No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching "high crimes and misdemeanors."
3%
No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching.
7%
I don't know.
1%
Great. Three more years of a limp president who couldn't get gas passed, let alone any appreciable legislation, by the congress of his own party. Three cheers for stagnation.
Yeah, three cheers for Democrat obstructionism.
In your fondest dreams. Know what I would like, the Fitzgerald's investigation be extended to include all the NSA leaks. Now wonder how
many would start seeking cover. Phlame (sp) looked good in PJ's didn't
she......like drug through a knot hole backwards.
"obstructionism."
see Repubs vs Clinton in the 90s, including shutdown of the US govt.
This week we see some Repub politicians voting against dubya/ head (and all their evil doings and Repub corruption and incompetence) because their voters have turned against dubya/ head as no longer credible and war as no longer supportable. dubya has no political capital to spend. All of this has NOTHING to do with the Democrats.
IMHO the only, and I mean the ONLY, good thing about keeping King George in office is the succession. I mean, who would we have--Cheney? Hastert? ing RICE for God's sake?
George is dangerous, but he's dumb and dangerous, and that beats smart and dangerous any day.
Not always. Hitler was not an exceptionally smart man.
White Rice?
Cunnilingus Rice sounds like a mexican dish. we oughta send her back to mexico and let the mexicans eat her. white power.
Hitler was a brilliant tac ioner, and an accomplished politician. To say he wasn't smart is simply not accurate. The guy was seriously ed up in the head, but he was brilliant at what he did. You can't compare Bush to Hitler, Bush is nowhere near as smart as Hitler, nor is he anywhere near as ed up in the head.
But Cheney is--as smart, and as ed up. So is Rove.You can't compare Bush to Hitler, Bush is nowhere near as smart as Hitler, nor is he anywhere near as ed up in the head.
Rove...now there is the Hitleresque figure. I think he's the Antichrist, myself.
Cheney... as smart as Hitler??![]()
Spoken like an expert. Your country like him and his kind.
OG, you have a serious problem. Do you want me to make you an
appointment with someone who could help?
xray, you're old so I wouldn't expect you to get the reference.
I don't get much of what you say; except, you have a hatred for
Bush and the country. Yeah, go ahead, tell me how much you love
the country. I may be old, but not stupid.
it's from the Chappelle Show, old-timer.
Never heard of it. Hey being an old-timer is much better than the
alternative. Hope you have the same opportunity to be called "old-timer".
I'll be a cranky old dude, hopefully
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)