Reply With Quote
Rumor has it that it won't hurt her pocketbook one bit. She's laughing all the way to the bank.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...amesfrey1.html
It;s a very long detailed article.JANUARY 8--Oprah Winfrey's been had.
Three months ago, in what the talk show host termed a "radical departure," Winfrey announced that "A Million Little Pieces," author James Frey's nonfiction memoir of his vomit-caked years as an alcoholic, drug addict, and criminal, was her latest selection for the world's most powerful book club.
In an October 26 show en led "The Man Who Kept Oprah Awake At Night," Winfrey hailed Frey's graphic and coarse book as "like nothing you've ever read before. Everybody at Harpo is reading it. When we were staying up late at night reading it, we'd come in the next morning saying, 'What page are you on?'" In emotional filmed testimonials, employees of Winfrey's Harpo Productions lauded the book as revelatory, with some choking back tears. When the camera then returned to a damp-eyed Winfrey, she said, "I'm crying 'cause these are all my Harpo family so, and we all loved the book so much."
But a six-week investigation by The Smoking Gun reveals that there may be a lot less to love about Frey's runaway hit, which has sold more than 3.5 million copies and, thanks to Winfrey, has sat atop The New York Times nonfiction paperback best seller list for the past 15 weeks. Next to the latest Harry Potter le, Nielsen BookScan reported Friday, Frey's book sold more copies in the U.S. in 2005--1.77 million--than any other le, with the majority of that total coming after Winfrey's selection.
Police reports, court records, interviews with law enforcement personnel, and other sources have put the lie to many key sections of Frey's book. The 36-year-old author, these do ents and interviews show, wholly fabricated or wildly embellished details of his purported criminal career, jail terms, and status as an outlaw "wanted in three states.".......................................... ...
Is it OK if I
@ this????? I find some sick pleasure in seeing someone get 1 over on her. Kinda like that happy feeling I got when Tom Cruise got water squirted in his face.
Rumor has it that it won't hurt her pocketbook one bit. She's laughing all the way to the bank.
How exactly did Oprah get scamed? The author pulled one over everyone if he listed his book as non-fiction and then fictionized (is that a word?) the story...
Side Note: I was just thinking about getting that book the other day, but I told myself to wait and get it the next time I'm at B&N...no way am I reading that book now.
How is this a negative on Oprah? The dude made up all that stuff....he's the asshole.
Oprah gives millions of dollars of her own money every year along with getting other corporations to give generously as well. If you don't like her then that's all well and good, but I don't see how her liking a book by an author who may or may not turn out to be a liar makes her be a laughing stock. He's the one who stands to lose face. Oprah didn't do anything wrong or unethical.
Just my measly 2 cents.
Scammed.
Wow, the Church of Oprah may be the mightiest of all . . .
I've never even seen one episode in all of the years she's been on....but I'm aware of how generous she's been over the years, and don't see how she's the one to be ridiculed because of some asswipe. Does that make me a member of that congregation?
thats is exactly what i'm talking about. It's liek everyear she gets more and more self righteous. And the way people worship her gets on my damn nerves.
So if other people talk about her, that makes you find her annoying??but I can't stand it when people in Hollywood talk about her
women
Oprah is still rich...
I wish she would pick my book...
i wish she would pick my nose...
Well it sounds like your beef should be with people who worship her, not her. SHe's just doing her job and doing good things. Who can fault her for that? I think she does great things to help people who deserve it, but I only worship God.
I have never watched more than five consecutive minutes of Oprah due to the risk of testicular atrophy.
However, she has done a lot of good for a lot of people. While she is not responsible for this clown, I do think, given the influence of her opinion, she needs to be more responsible about researching the facts for any nonfiction books she endorses.
On the other hand, she always will have a warm spot in my heart for providing us with this:
So do I understand you correctly in thinking that you are saying that before each and every time she is allowed to say "I read a book that I enjoyed and you might enjoy it too" that she must employ a team of private investigators to check into the authors background? There is no author that could ever go on a book tour with kind of scrutiny. No show would book anyone with that kind of liability over their heads. Also everyone here seems to be forgetting the fact that this author was also on every other talkshow as well. But nobody seems to be blasting anyone else about their giving him press.
I have never watched more than five consecutive minutes of Oprah due to the risk of testicular atrophy.
However, she has done a lot of good for a lot of people. While she is not responsible for this clown, I do think, given the influence of her opinion, she needs to be more responsible about researching the facts for any nonfiction books she endorses.
On the other hand, she always will have a warm spot in my heart for providing us with this:
Even though I'm not trying to ridicule Oprah in any way, shape or form, I will openly admit that I am damn envious of that girl's net worth.
Just for nonfiction books. It's not that hard to do some very rudimental fact-checking. Talk and news shows employ entire cadres of gophers who spend untold hours doing all kinds of silly stuff. How hard would it be to have one of two people make a couple of phones calls?
Oprah knows when someone goes on her show (as opposed to others), it means millions for them.
How much you want to bet they'll check some facts now?
I've watched Oprah for years and thinks she is a great woman.
She has her ups and downs.....in weight....but she's solid.
Then how come the Smoking Gun investigation took 6-weeks to break any news about it?It's not that hard to do some very rudimental fact-checking.
This is such a non-story to me. Oprah read a book and liked it and now someone found out it wasn't a factual book. I don't get how that really reflects on Oprah.
I've never watched her show and I find it funny that so many women are bugged by her. (Note: You must be watching to be bugged by her - so she win$).
I've never watched her show and I find it funny that so many women are bugged by her
Im the same way.
Other than really being pissed off about her story on the mad cow thing, and how that damaged the american farmer, I think she does alot of great things.
Very generous and very giving.
Of course, thats a bad thing.......
Cause people were lazy and/or just had other things to do? How many times have we blasted sportwriters here for not bothering to do very simple fact checking in their stories? Did the Smoking Gun really spend six weeks on it, or did it take them 5 and 5/7 weeks to get around to it and two days to break it?
Look, if the guy put time and effort into covering his tracks that's one thing; you can't fault anyone. But you read every day how much people get by on outrageous bull that doesn't stand up to even the slightest scrutiny. THAT shouldn't happen on Oprah's show.
Thought you were going to get away with that one, did you?
Oprah is just annoying as , with or without pushing bull books on the public.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
