Once again the sports news channels are talking about how horrible a finals between the Spurs and Pistons will be... and they are hoping a jazzy fast paced team will make an upset.
They also dont like Dallas and Pistons...
Now, everyone knows, barring Sheed and Ben getting struck and killed by lightning, that the Pistons will get to the finals, everyone also knows that barring injury and cxrappy defense the Spurs are going to get there as well... playoff basketball is all about defense and energy, which both teams have, and controlling the pace of the game.
Heres my theory.
Last years finals were a fraud for the first four games.
No one... I mean no one, can actually believe the Spurs would blow the Pistons out twice at home while Detriot kind of hung out and watched them score, then jog around for two games as Detroit went on a shooting practice for 96 minutes... then suddenly a finals contest breaks out in three extremely close, incredibly good games.
My theory... the NBA said were going to 7 games, no one wants to see this matchup, the most money can be made with a full series and everyone will watch. Spurs get the first two at home, Pistons get the second, and its best of 3 Spurs with HCA. Why else would they change it to a 2-3-2 series?
Heres my question, how many of you out there think the same thing will happen this year when the 2005 finals repeat in 2006? Will it be best of 7 or another fixed best of 3?