Reply With Quote
I've heard rumors that they are trying to package him with a few other players to get Garnett.
Just read on cnn/si that the bulls well probably try and trade ben gordon this summer. Why not package barry/beno or barry/Nazr(sign and trade)...Is this someone yall think would help the spurs in the future and if so who would you try and trade for him??
I've heard rumors that they are trying to package him with a few other players to get Garnett.
... I don't see that working out. If anything the Wolves are going to want at least an All-star in exchange and the bulls don't have any.
Bulls would probably be one of the few teams to give quality young players for an all-star like Garnett...
Can you imagine this Bulls team, with Garnett as low post threat? hmmm... i'd be scared. It seems that is what they've been missing, a good big to require a double team.
Garnett w/the Bulls might give the Pistons a run for their money.
It wouldn't be "this" bulls team, they'd have to give up Gordon/Nocioni or Deng at the least
Why not trade barry/nazr/scola for chandler/gordon
Why would the bulls make this trade?
they get a big in nazr (probably at a cheaper price), get a veteran like barry (which they need very badly), and they get one of the top prospects at PF (I don't even know who plays pf for the bulls?)
So basically, they get Barry to play 3rd string to Deng and Nocioni, and they get to deal with Scola's buy out?
Dont the bulls have that number 1 pick from the knicks?
they could throw that in.
If the Bulls traded Gordon, Nocioni and Chandler for Garnett, the Bulls would end up as the 6th or 7th seed in the East, lose in the first round, and we'd hear again how Garnett hasn't had any support.
and the Wolves would win their division
Heinrich,barry,deng,scola,nazr........you would play barry at the 2 and bring nocioni in as your sixth man...We might even thrown in beno(how could they refuse)....
we really dont need ben gordon, we already have finley and ginobili
Gordon can play the 1 or 2...finley can play the 2 or 3.. Manu can play the 1, 2, or 3....
As Charles Barkley said "Ben Gordon is instant offense........ on both ends"
Because the Bulls won't trade away the future to break even in the present.
I think the Bulls have 1 or 2 lottery picks this year as well.. SO they could use both of those and throw in a couple of young players to ge Garnett. I think they have 12 mill in cap space so all they would have to send is 8 mill...
i don't think Garnett is the answer for the bulls.
You dont win in this league if dont have veterans on your squad!!They have alot of good young talent, but they need to filter in some veterans to go deeper in the playoffs!!
garnett's contract would hinder signing other players. didnt'c chandler just get extended as well? they can't depend on signing vets on the cheap. if they want to keep the young talent in a few years garnett is not the way to go.
Veterans are good, but I think Barry starting makes them worse than they are this year.
The way to do that is to sign the veterans as free agents, not to trade your core young talent for them.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
