doah!!
Speaking in Atlanta today, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was sharply questioned about his pre-war claims about WMD in Iraq. An audience member confronted Rumsfeld with his 2003 claim about WMD, “We know where they are.” Rumsfeld falsely claimed he never said it. The audience member then read Rumsfeld’s quote back to him, leaving the defense secretary speechless.
Of course, Rumsfeld did say he knew where the WMD were. From ABC’s This Week, 5/4/03:
Read the full transcript HERE.Think ProgressSTEPHANOPOULOS: And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven’t found any weapons of mass destruction?
SEC. RUMSFELD: …We know where they are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.
Weapons of Mass DestructiOwN3d
video link
I love how Rummy was at a loss of words.
http://www.cnn.com/video/player/play...otests.mxf.cnn
::crickets::
rummy = war criminal for starting a phony war
, on the local news blimps they stopped reporting this story after mentioning that Rummy said, "I did not lie", so most people in South Texas don't even know the full story of what took place after.
"I did not lie" was a lie.
![]()
I watched the clip for some reason I kept switching to FauxNews but didn't see it being reported? That damn liberal media!!!!
I just watched their footage at the FoxNews Website. I can't imagine they'd post footage they didn't air.
Follow the "VIDEO" Link (far right selection in the red banner across the top) and look for this picture. Two minutes long. I wonder how much of the exchange was shown on the other networks and how it might have been edited.
Nice try Yoni,
but that Faux video link for some reason is edited. It doesn't show when Rummy was at a loss for words for that long period of time when the gentleman quoted Rummy stating they knew where the WMD's were after Rummy told him he hasn't lied and those were not his words.
Strange.
Well, there you go again. It was NOT edited and showed the entire exchange between Rummy and the retired CIA dude, sorry can't recall his name. No editing was necessary at all.
Why can't you just admit that Rummy got pwned? It really isn't hard to do and nobody will accuse of abandoning your loyal support for Rummy and Bush.
Transcript
QUESTION: So I would like to ask you to be up front with the American people, why did you lie to get us into a war that was not necessary, that has caused these kinds of casualties? why?
RUMSFELD: Well, first of all, I haven’t lied. I did not lie then. Colin Powell didn’t lie. He spent weeks and weeks with the Central Intelligence Agency people and prepared a presentation that I know he believed was accurate, and he presented that to the United Nations. the president spent weeks and weeks with the central intelligence people and he went to the american people and made a presentation. i’m not in the intelligence business. they gave the world their honest opinion. it appears that there were not weapons of mass destruction there.
QUESTION: You said you knew where they were.
RUMSFELD: I did not. I said I knew where suspect sites were and –
QUESTION: You said you knew where they were Tikrit, Baghdad, northeast, south, west of there. Those are your words.
RUMSFELD: My words — my words were that — no, no, wait a minute, wait a minute. Let him stay one second. Just a second.
de..de..de.......d...d.dd..d.........
::crickets::
OWNED!!
Time for the old man to go. Maybe if we can get him out before the election Bush will appoint Lieberman and we can replace Lieberman with a real Democrat.
Takes one to know one. Oh, am I am a Native American, I was borned in
Texas and raised in Texas and still live in Texas. Are you?
The exchange was interesting. What was more interesting was the coverage that showed Rumsfeld saying, verbatim, all of the things the questioner pounded him about. It was pretty damning to see Rumsfeld denying he ever said such things, only to see visual proof that he had. I don't see how that can be anything other than embarassing to the administration; I can also see why some would choose to deduce from that exchange that the Administration has been less-than-forthcoming in a variety of ways.
Rumsfeld either lied or he has an extremely short memory.
I saw the entire 2 minute exchange on CNN last night.
I also saw that the questioner stopped asking questions when asked to and that he sat down and civilly listened to the remainder of Rumsfeld's talk. To Rumsfeld's credit, he had an out when the guy was apparently going to be escorted out of the hall; the Secretary, however, asked that the questioner be permitted to stay.
He's a former CIA analyst -- what could he possibly know? Now he's a traitor too. Questioning the Secretary about such things -- riduculous!
He joins a long list of people who all of sudden hate America.
Richard Clarke
Joe Wilson
the first Secretary of Treasury under 43
Lawerence Wilkerson
the list goes on.......
Liberal Blogger Andrew Sullivan says the man who heckled Rummy was...
No not some crazed lefty. The man was Ray McGovern, who Conservative Blogger Sweetness and Light noticed awhile back was part of Daniel Ellsberg's Truth Telling Project. At the time, Sweetness & Light was commenting that the press had quoted two former counterterrorism experts in defense of Mary McCarthy but omitted one interesting detail, which may or may not be relevant. Here's ABC News report quoting the first expert, Ray McGovern to the effect that McCarthy had a higher duty to "defend the cons ution".
Then Sweetness and Light notices that both Ray McGovern and Larry Johnson are associated with Daniel Ellsberg's The Truth-Telling Project. For those who are unfamiliar with the name Daniel Ellsberg, here's the Wikipedia entry.
Ray McGovern's role is described on this Truth-Telling Project web page.
While watching the video I fully expected Rummy to be massacred inside McGovern's kill-zone since McGovern had the ability to choose the very specific ground on which to challenge Rumsfeld. The verbatim transcript of the exchange is below.
The counterfactual which proves Rumsfeld "lied" is this cited exchange from a DOD briefing:
But the citation is not complete. If you read the full exchange, which took place at a briefing on March 30,2003 it will be abundantly clear Rumsfeld made these statements when neither Tikrit and Baghdad were in Coalition hands. Baghdad fell on April 8, 2003, more than a week after this exchange between Rumsfeld and Stephanopoulos. Tikrit fell even later. The verbatim exchange is given below..
And, now, for the rest of the story:
And now for the money quote -- stated way back on March 30, 2003 and immediately after the line McGovern used in his attempt to prove Secretary Rumsfeld lied:
Ray McGovern had plenty of time to do what I just did, to examine the transcript above. Go ahead, do it yourself...follow the links.
It's abundantly clear from the transcript that Rumsfeld had only intelligence indications that the WMD were "in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat". It was clearly a statement of belief that the WMDs would be found there. He also categorically warned Stephanopoulous the WMDs might not be found at all. "I would also add, we saw from the air that there were dozens of trucks that went into that facility after the existence of it became public in the press and they moved things out. They dispersed them and took them away. So there may be nothing left. I don't know that. But it's way too soon to know. The exploitation is just starting."
None of this means the points which Ray McGovern raised were invalid. But it is not obviously the case that Rumsfeld knew for a fact the WMDs would not be found in Tikrit, Baghdad, etc ... and lied about it. Rumsfield may have lied at some other time on some other subject, although I doubt it, but the proof is not to be found in the exchange above -- which is the "proof" McGovern used in his exchange.
What would be more convincing is some kind of do ent which indicated intelligence believed they would not be found in Tikrit, Baghdad and other suspect places and that Rumsfeld maintained the contrary. But the exchange above actually supports Rumsfeld's assertion that he maintained they were "suspect sites" rather than sites in which he had definite knowledge of their location. I think the assertion that McGovern "proved" that Rumsfeld lied is simply an assertion. And no, Ray McGovern was not some "crazed lefty". He was the best the Left had to prove that Rumsfeld lied fighting on his chosen ground. And he didn't prove anything.
Don't with the Rummy es.
Oh god, not this again. Yeah, it was in the press alright. Worldnetdaily, FAUX News, and NewsmaxSecretary Rumsfeld (continued): "I would also add, we saw from the air that there were dozens of trucks that went into that facility after the existence of it became public in the press and they moved things out. They dispersed them and took them away. So there may be nothing left. I don't know that. But it's way too soon to know. The exploitation is just starting."
![]()
So according to Yoni, the Iraqi's moved, dare I say, destroyed, the suspected WMD's "around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." Just to embarrass Rummy.
Could happen.
Yoni should have spent some time googling Sibel Edmonds.Current coalition members include Sibel Edmonds, Daniel Ellsberg, Frank Grevil, Katharine Gun, Ray McGovern, Coleen Rowley, the Project on Government Oversight, and the ACLU
Rummy shoulda only spoke in front of troops like I do.
That's how I roll.
I'm George W Bush and I approve this message![]()
Did you just cut and paste this guy's entire blog entry? Is one word of that entire post actually your original thought?
Yoni hasn't had an original thought in years.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)