What about a HUGE line up?

[lebomb]

Tim
Nazi
Rasho or Horry
Manu
Tony

........screw it, lets give it a try.....small ball does NOT work.


Lets make Dallas beat us from the outside......clog that lane.

[Gerryatrics]

I think a huge (but not totally unbelievable) lineup would be...

PG Brent Barry
SG Finley/Bowen
SF Horry/Marks/Oberto
PF Tim Duncan
C Rasho/Nazr

[lebomb]

I think a huge (but not totally unbelievable) lineup would be...

PG Brent Barry
SG Finley/Bowen
SF Horry/Marks/Oberto
PF Tim Duncan
C Rasho/Nazr

Yeah, but we do need Tony and Manu to play.....Im just looking at 3 huge guys on the block.

[ginobme]

well...with our "small" lineup, the mavs are still too fast and athletic, going big would force them to take jump shots, but with the way terry, and stack are shooting it would be a pretty big risk to take during an elimination game....

[fraga]

Yeah I was wondering why Pop hasn't clogged up the middle to make it harder for Dallas to penetrate...

[PeterBurns]

Yeah I was wondering why Pop hasn't clogged up the middle to make it harder for Dallas to penetrate...

F'N AMEN.....

[td4mvp21]

I would love for us to clog the lane, Dallas isn't gonna shoot lights out EVERY night. And if they do, well then they will win the series.

[Hardcor]

I'm not sure the huge lineup would be real effective either. The Spurs are having a huge problem with the pick and roll and having a bigger, slower lineup would allow more jumpshots over the top of the pick. The biggest problem we are having right now is if we get in front of them they penetrate, if we jump the screen under, they shot from 15 feet (see Stack, Terry). We are just not athletic enough right now. Barry and Horry and Finley can't stay with their men and I can't count how many times Parker ended up on Dirk, just so he could shoot over the top. Or they make the extra pass for a wide open jumper.

[sakpase]

Go big is the solutions:

the transition defense will be better, right now the small try to go to much for Offensive rebound, and they caught off positions.

Make Dallas bet us with jump shots, not penetrations (sure like regular season we have to contest each shoots)

More Chance For Rebound

less penetration=less contact=Less fouls = less free trow

The Spurs (like Detroit) is Defense and Rebound, not small ball like Suns.
when we alloys more then 100 pts per game we lost.

PG Tony/Brent Barry
SG Brent Barry/Manu
SF Bowen/Finley
PF Tim Duncan/Horry
C Rasho/Nazr

[fraga]

I'd rather them beat us with 10 ft. jumpshots then penetrating layups...

[nkdlunch]

One thing Spurs should seriously consider. Use Rasho and nazr for good 12 hard fouls. Let's put them in when we over the limit to discipline the ing mavs. Why not.

[polandprzem]

One thing Spurs should seriously consider. Use Rasho and nazr for good 12 hard fouls. Let's put them in when we over the limit to discipline the ing mavs. Why not.

It is definately time for that kind of experiments

[nkdlunch]

has our regular plan been working?.... nope

[blaze89]

One thing Spurs should seriously consider. Use Rasho and nazr for good 12 hard fouls. Let's put them in when we over the limit to discipline the ing mavs. Why not.

Against a pretty good FT shooting team, which includes one player that shoots 90%.

[ginobme]

i know we rarely use it, but why not a 2-3 zone with the larger line up?

[strangeweather]

PG Tony/Brent Barry
SG Brent Barry/Manu
SF Bowen/Finley
PF Tim Duncan/Horry
C Rasho/Nazr

That's a team that looks like the Spurs.

[blaze89]

I would love for us to clog the lane, Dallas isn't gonna shoot lights out EVERY night. And if they do, well then they will win the series.

Dallas has been shooting lights out since game 2, it seems everything they put up in the air, has found it's way to the basket.

[strangeweather]

One thing Spurs should seriously consider. Use Rasho and nazr for good 12 hard fouls. Let's put them in when we over the limit to discipline the ing mavs. Why not.

, activate the Kiwi and get more. Make Van Exel's sorry ass inactive.